Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Current New York Tarisio Auction Violin Lot 137. Why would a maker choose to make a top with a knot like the one on this fiddle? Wouldn't it be better to make a top that doesn't have a knot?

Posted

Maybe because it didn't bother him. It doesn't bother me. There's nothing inherently wrong with a knot if it isn't in a bad place. A violinist won the Paganini Competition a couple of decades ago with a Stradivari violin with two big knots in the back. 

A knot like that one is somewhat likely to pop up later in the process, not evident right from the start.

Posted

That's a big knot.  Assuming the maker started with wedges, it would be out at the thin end where I'd find it hard to believe it would be hidden before carving.  Only the maker could say what is thinking and aesthetic decisions were; no way I'd use it.  Maybe I'd cut that edge off and splice on a wing.

Posted

There were also times in the history of violin making where makers couldn’t access ‘good’ (= visually beautiful) material. Makers in Cremona working after the golden age (forcexample) used top plates with knots, back plates were made from unflamed maple, beech, chestnut and other uncommon types of wood. 
 

The reason could have been that they couldn’t afford better material and/or some supply lines dried out. In any case can a skilled maker work around smaller defects in the wood.

Posted

Whether you like the look or not, knots are severe disturbances and discontinuities in the grain that can cause problems, such as becoming detached and falling out.  Expansion and contraction with weather or over time will be different for the knot vs. the surrounding wood.  Sure, they CAN be OK, or be glued back in if they loosen... but as a maker, avoiding these issues is easy by getting another piece of wood.

I'm not a knot fan, particularly for large ones like these:

knot.jpg.f952bd3b0c6b0e10637b31d319c572f5.jpg

Posted

There were also times in the history of violin making where makers couldn’t access ‘good’ (= visually beautiful) material. Makers in Cremona working after the golden age (forcexample) used top plates with knots, back plates were made from unflamed maple, beech, chestnut and other uncommon types of wood. 

In 1957?

 


 

Posted
13 hours ago, Andreas Preuss said:

There were also times in the history of violin making where makers couldn’t access ‘good’ (= visually beautiful) material. Makers in Cremona working after the golden age (forcexample) used top plates with knots, back plates were made from unflamed maple, beech, chestnut and other uncommon types of wood. 
 

The reason could have been that they couldn’t afford better material and/or some supply lines dried out.

36 minutes ago, stern said:

In 1957?

I'm thinkin' that poverty and various sorts of supply shortages had not completely gone away by 1957. ;)

Posted

I suggest that another reason to use wood with a knot (besides those mentioned) is if you have used a bunch of billets from the same tree, perhaps you sort of know what to expect from the wood. Maybe it was good spruce, sonically, and the knot was close enough to the edge, solid enough.

Personally I like the oddity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...