Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Ganymede Piggot said:

Perfect.

And my view is simple…if you’re playing the violin outside and somehow manage to sound BETTER than what Hillary just did, you’re doctoring the audio.  

Which in and of itself is fine, just make it clear that you are and don’t pass it off as that’s your unfiltered playing.

 

thanks for posting that, I had wondered if she had any recordings of herself playing outdoors…such an exceptional talent

Posted
1 hour ago, Victor Roman said:

No, I think it's a potatophone. Not much else would explain the... fine musicianship. 

The annual celebration of "Mr. Potatohead" took place just nine days ago.
Mr. Potatohead

The juxtaposition of these two events is surely more than coincidence. :o

Posted

The only viable reference recording I know of (and widely accepted) is a true stereo pair of microphones with flat frequency response such as B&K reference mics.

They are absurdly expensive and of course sound like shit for any kind of musical applications.

Then you need an anechoic chamber … ie. no room sound, zero reflections.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, martin swan said:

>

Then you need an anechoic chamber … ie. no room sound, zero reflections.

 

Long ago, Anders Buen tested a violin for me.  He took it into a small men's room that had ceramic tiles everywhere so when he played ot there were reverberant sound reflections bouncing all over--the opposite of an anechoic chamber. So with just one microphone he was able to pick up all of the violin's directional sound outputs.

I thought it was a great idea until a fellow came in to take a piss and looked at us carefully.

Posted
52 minutes ago, Marty Kasprzyk said:

Long ago, Anders Buen tested a violin for me.  He took it into a small men's room that had ceramic tiles everywhere so when he played ot there were reverberant sound reflections bouncing all over--the opposite of an anechoic chamber. So with just one microphone he was able to pick up all of the violin's directional sound outputs.

I thought it was a great idea until a fellow came in to take a piss and looked at us carefully.

Last time I played my violin in the shower I had to put it in the clothes drier afterwards. Until it sounded much drier. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Victor Roman said:

I need to get out more....  :)

David is from the future. Still 20 days to go. Pencil it in your calendar.

Posted
15 hours ago, Victor Roman said:

No, I think it's a potatophone. Not much else would explain the... fine musicianship. 

That was quite shocking. Had to listen twice.

Posted
18 hours ago, LCF said:

David is from the future. Still 20 days to go. Pencil it in your calendar.

Mr. Potatohead arrived in Australia somewhat later than in North America, due to travel time. Hence, Australia has their own special calendar. ;)

Posted
21 hours ago, Marty Kasprzyk said:

Long ago, Anders Buen tested a violin for me.  He took it into a small men's room that had ceramic tiles everywhere so when he played ot there were reverberant sound reflections bouncing all over--the opposite of an anechoic chamber. So with just one microphone he was able to pick up all of the violin's directional sound outputs.

I thought it was a great idea until a fellow came in to take a piss and looked at us carefully.

:D

Any room or mic configuration is fine if you are carrying out your own research, as long as it doesn’t vary.

But for a protocol that gives usable results between researchers, you need to eliminate room artefacts and mic coloration …

Posted
10 hours ago, David Burgess said:

Mr. Potatohead arrived in Australia somewhat later than in North America, due to travel time. Hence, Australia has their own special calendar. ;)

So you're not really from the future? :o

Posted
23 hours ago, VicM said:

That was quite shocking. Had to listen twice.

I listen to it 24 hours a day.  I'm researching ways to dereverbify Milstein's second box set using Artificial Intelligence and technology from the Russian space program.

Posted
2 hours ago, Ganymede Piggot said:

I listen to it 24 hours a day.  I'm researching ways to dereverbify Milstein's second box set

Run it through a stiff compressor. It will fit back in the box more easily.

Posted
15 hours ago, martin swan said:

Any room or mic configuration is fine if you are carrying out your own research, as long as it doesn’t vary.

But for a protocol that gives usable results between researchers, you need to eliminate room artefacts and mic coloration …

True that.  Reproducible apparatus and methodology are fundamental to useful research.  You can't compare the flavor of an apple and an orange by eating a banana and an oyster - something like that.

Posted
9 hours ago, Dr. Mark said:

True that.  Reproducible apparatus and methodology are fundamental to useful research.  You can't compare the flavor of an apple and an orange by eating a banana and an oyster - something like that.

Mr. Potatohead tells me, It is maybe possible to compare the flavour of an apple banana

Screenshot_20250411-233446.thumb.png.7b7908cc75d40c7ad00edaacda95c813.png

With an Orange Oyster, if you can find one available to taste!

Screenshot_20250411-233347.thumb.png.d21328552e5edc17fd1d14464e7b4746.png

Posted
2 hours ago, Andrew tkinson said:

Mr. Potatohead tells me, It is maybe possible to compare the flavour of an apple banana

 

With an Orange Oyster, if you can find one available to taste!

Perhaps you could mix up some oyster flavoured Irn-bru?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/9/2025 at 12:32 AM, Randall The Restorer said:

Judicious application and careful positioning of textiles play a major role in live performance spaces and dedicated recording studios. 
I am not a recording engineer - but I have been recorded in, and broadcast from, world class studios in Toronto.

Randy

Haven't noticed anybody bothering with that during countless recording sessions. That being "Judicious application and careful positioning of textiles". The problem is that everybody knows what's "textiles" while very few know what's "judicious". And even fewer of those agree.

Posted
On 4/11/2025 at 6:49 PM, Andrew tkinson said:

Mr. Potatohead tells me, It is maybe possible to compare the flavour of an apple banana...

A level of emotional cruelty hardly imaginable in this day and age.

Posted
12 hours ago, Victor Roman said:

I am quite curious what is going on there and why. And maybe, where. 

Zdrung violin, zdrung player. 

Posted
13 hours ago, VicM said:

Zdrung violin, zdrung player. 

Harsh perhaps but there are also some strange artefacts in that recording which sound to me like a combination of poor quality analogue to digital conversion combined with a cheap microphone without a windsock or dead cat fitted,  leading to some compression artefacts driven by wind noise. 

 

Feeding cleaner sections of that recording through a simple iir process as I described earlier makes it sound much like a regular performance in a large space, even up to being similar to the original 'church' space of the OP.  A non-reverberant environment exposes the harshness of approach which might be necessary to fill a large reverberant performance space.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...