outofnames Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 4 hours ago, Ganymede Piggot said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa8jP2J8ut4 Perfect. And my view is simple…if you’re playing the violin outside and somehow manage to sound BETTER than what Hillary just did, you’re doctoring the audio. Which in and of itself is fine, just make it clear that you are and don’t pass it off as that’s your unfiltered playing. thanks for posting that, I had wondered if she had any recordings of herself playing outdoors…such an exceptional talent
David Burgess Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 hour ago, Victor Roman said: No, I think it's a potatophone. Not much else would explain the... fine musicianship. The annual celebration of "Mr. Potatohead" took place just nine days ago. Mr. Potatohead The juxtaposition of these two events is surely more than coincidence.
martin swan Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 The only viable reference recording I know of (and widely accepted) is a true stereo pair of microphones with flat frequency response such as B&K reference mics. They are absurdly expensive and of course sound like shit for any kind of musical applications. Then you need an anechoic chamber … ie. no room sound, zero reflections.
Victor Roman Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 1 hour ago, David Burgess said: The annual celebration of "Mr. Potatohead" took place just nine days ago. Mr. Potatohead The juxtaposition of these two events is surely more than coincidence. I need to get out more....
Marty Kasprzyk Posted April 9 Report Posted April 9 2 hours ago, martin swan said: > Then you need an anechoic chamber … ie. no room sound, zero reflections. Long ago, Anders Buen tested a violin for me. He took it into a small men's room that had ceramic tiles everywhere so when he played ot there were reverberant sound reflections bouncing all over--the opposite of an anechoic chamber. So with just one microphone he was able to pick up all of the violin's directional sound outputs. I thought it was a great idea until a fellow came in to take a piss and looked at us carefully.
LCF Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 52 minutes ago, Marty Kasprzyk said: Long ago, Anders Buen tested a violin for me. He took it into a small men's room that had ceramic tiles everywhere so when he played ot there were reverberant sound reflections bouncing all over--the opposite of an anechoic chamber. So with just one microphone he was able to pick up all of the violin's directional sound outputs. I thought it was a great idea until a fellow came in to take a piss and looked at us carefully. Last time I played my violin in the shower I had to put it in the clothes drier afterwards. Until it sounded much drier.
LCF Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 2 hours ago, Victor Roman said: I need to get out more.... David is from the future. Still 20 days to go. Pencil it in your calendar.
VicM Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 15 hours ago, Victor Roman said: No, I think it's a potatophone. Not much else would explain the... fine musicianship. That was quite shocking. Had to listen twice.
David Burgess Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 18 hours ago, LCF said: David is from the future. Still 20 days to go. Pencil it in your calendar. Mr. Potatohead arrived in Australia somewhat later than in North America, due to travel time. Hence, Australia has their own special calendar.
martin swan Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 21 hours ago, Marty Kasprzyk said: Long ago, Anders Buen tested a violin for me. He took it into a small men's room that had ceramic tiles everywhere so when he played ot there were reverberant sound reflections bouncing all over--the opposite of an anechoic chamber. So with just one microphone he was able to pick up all of the violin's directional sound outputs. I thought it was a great idea until a fellow came in to take a piss and looked at us carefully. Any room or mic configuration is fine if you are carrying out your own research, as long as it doesn’t vary. But for a protocol that gives usable results between researchers, you need to eliminate room artefacts and mic coloration …
LCF Posted April 11 Report Posted April 11 10 hours ago, David Burgess said: Mr. Potatohead arrived in Australia somewhat later than in North America, due to travel time. Hence, Australia has their own special calendar. So you're not really from the future?
Jacobus Drainer Posted April 11 Report Posted April 11 23 hours ago, VicM said: That was quite shocking. Had to listen twice. I listen to it 24 hours a day. I'm researching ways to dereverbify Milstein's second box set using Artificial Intelligence and technology from the Russian space program.
LCF Posted April 11 Report Posted April 11 2 hours ago, Ganymede Piggot said: I listen to it 24 hours a day. I'm researching ways to dereverbify Milstein's second box set Run it through a stiff compressor. It will fit back in the box more easily.
Dr. Mark Posted April 11 Report Posted April 11 15 hours ago, martin swan said: Any room or mic configuration is fine if you are carrying out your own research, as long as it doesn’t vary. But for a protocol that gives usable results between researchers, you need to eliminate room artefacts and mic coloration … True that. Reproducible apparatus and methodology are fundamental to useful research. You can't compare the flavor of an apple and an orange by eating a banana and an oyster - something like that.
Andrew tkinson Posted April 11 Report Posted April 11 9 hours ago, Dr. Mark said: True that. Reproducible apparatus and methodology are fundamental to useful research. You can't compare the flavor of an apple and an orange by eating a banana and an oyster - something like that. Mr. Potatohead tells me, It is maybe possible to compare the flavour of an apple banana With an Orange Oyster, if you can find one available to taste!
LCF Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 2 hours ago, Andrew tkinson said: Mr. Potatohead tells me, It is maybe possible to compare the flavour of an apple banana With an Orange Oyster, if you can find one available to taste! Perhaps you could mix up some oyster flavoured Irn-bru?
Victor Roman Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 On 4/10/2025 at 2:24 AM, LCF said: David is from the future. Still 20 days to go. Pencil it in your calendar. Done....
Victor Roman Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 On 4/10/2025 at 12:19 PM, VicM said: That was quite shocking. Had to listen twice. I am quite curious what is going on there and why. And maybe, where.
Victor Roman Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 On 4/9/2025 at 12:32 AM, Randall The Restorer said: Judicious application and careful positioning of textiles play a major role in live performance spaces and dedicated recording studios. I am not a recording engineer - but I have been recorded in, and broadcast from, world class studios in Toronto. Randy Haven't noticed anybody bothering with that during countless recording sessions. That being "Judicious application and careful positioning of textiles". The problem is that everybody knows what's "textiles" while very few know what's "judicious". And even fewer of those agree.
Dr. Mark Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 On 4/11/2025 at 6:49 PM, Andrew tkinson said: Mr. Potatohead tells me, It is maybe possible to compare the flavour of an apple banana... A level of emotional cruelty hardly imaginable in this day and age.
VicM Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 12 hours ago, Victor Roman said: I am quite curious what is going on there and why. And maybe, where. Zdrung violin, zdrung player.
LCF Posted April 23 Report Posted April 23 13 hours ago, VicM said: Zdrung violin, zdrung player. Harsh perhaps but there are also some strange artefacts in that recording which sound to me like a combination of poor quality analogue to digital conversion combined with a cheap microphone without a windsock or dead cat fitted, leading to some compression artefacts driven by wind noise. Feeding cleaner sections of that recording through a simple iir process as I described earlier makes it sound much like a regular performance in a large space, even up to being similar to the original 'church' space of the OP. A non-reverberant environment exposes the harshness of approach which might be necessary to fill a large reverberant performance space.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now