Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently acquired what appears to be a nicely made pernambuco viola bow (stick only) with a butt-ugly head.  The shape of the outer end lacks grace, and the chamfers are crudely cut with uneven widths and coarse file marks.  Re-cutting the head so that I can stand to look at it, and also replacing the face plate, would make an interesting little project.  The only thing that makes me hesitate is my nagging fear that this ugly head might be the signature of some maker whose work I should not defile.  The stick bears no stamps.

Should I re-cut this bow head?

 

P1170238.thumb.JPG.899db13a034469b3a18b626ac0680b2c.JPG

 

P1170241.thumb.JPG.da103e57114780a5bfc2b9c8676b967f.JPG

 

P1170240.thumb.JPG.61d9d427fbe208caadda36316c667c6e.JPG

 

P1170243.thumb.JPG.a6e939edb5f66593b2459380b7583f4e.JPG

 

Posted

Can't speak to this bow, but a friend of mine was ordered by the owner to remove an non-existent 1600s Cremonese maker's (from a good family) label from an instrument and refused. Several years later that maker was rediscovered and that instrument was one of only three or four by him currently known. So be careful.

I say just replace the headplate.

Posted
On 3/10/2023 at 9:27 AM, GeorgeH said:

It looks to me like the head was already vandalized by the person who replaced the tip plate.

Maybe, but I don't see any obvious signs that it is a replacement.  The crudity of the plate matches the "butt-ugliness" of the rest of the head, which suggests that it is original.

Posted

The question is IMO what is motivating you, to sell it as something what it isn't?:ph34r:From an aesthetical pov, it's so crude that it even starts to look attractive in my eyes.

Posted

Any material removal will weaken the head, and change the balance. Arguably, the balance can be manipulated with the plate, but I would still be hesitant to be attacking the wood.

Posted
2 hours ago, jacobsaunders said:

 Is “butt-ugly” an American coin of phrase?

 

1 hour ago, Brad Dorsey said:

Yes, but I think it would be a good addition to your arsenal.

I don’t dare send David a picture of my butt, lest he were to pin it on his workshop wall ;)

Posted
2 hours ago, Blank face said:

The question is IMO what is motivating you, to sell it as something what it isn't?:ph34r:From an aesthetical pov, it's so crude that it even starts to look attractive in my eyes.

It very well might have been something that came from the Salustri shop;) 

Posted

I’d be tempted to either send a slew of photos or the bow itself to someone like Paul Childs and see if it rings any bells with him. I’d hate for you to miss something about the bow, alter the head and ultimately devalue the darn thing.

Posted

With a bit of fantasy one could imagine that the head shape is a bit similar to a Schramm or something like the older South German made bows, but this would mean that it should be older than 1850, what appears to be unlikely here. From what I know these heads can have a somehow crude shape like here, but the details of workmanship like the chamfers are more neat. Anyway, I can't see any possible improvement by overworking/reshaping it. Either one likes it as it is or should take a different bow.

Posted

Sorry I can't understand why you would want to recut a bow head.

If you don't like it, who knows if your taste is the same as someone else's? And how sure are you that it's not a Gaulard?

If it's genuinely no good, no amount of modification will make it better.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Nick Allen said:

You could even do some fill near the tip. Extend it slightly behind the tip nub to help transition into the tip more gracefully. 

I plan to do that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...