Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

I always get irritated by those terms such as “fine” “good” “interesting” “important” or even “property of a lady”

I think they are really unnecessary as the descriptive terms of the lots 

Glad to see Tarisio has abandoned this in the recent auctions 

Posted

I'm waiting for someone to offer a "coarse, boring, common, and unimportant violin", that's "the property of a hooligan".  It would certainly be refreshing.  :lol:

Posted
4 minutes ago, Violadamore said:

... "coarse, boring, common, and unimportant violin", that's "the property of a hooligan".  ..

 :lol:

Sold! Just need to confirm that the certificate is authentic...

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Violadamore said:

I'm waiting for someone to offer a "coarse, boring, common, and unimportant violin", that's "the property of a hooligan".  It would certainly be refreshing.  :lol:

Nigel Kennedy's Strad?

Posted
51 minutes ago, Violadamore said:

I'm waiting for someone to offer a "coarse, boring, common, and unimportant violin", that's "the property of a hooligan".  It would certainly be refreshing.  :lol:

You told me you didn’t want to sell your Salustri

Posted
7 hours ago, Violadamore said:

I'm waiting for someone to offer a "coarse, boring, common, and unimportant violin", that's "the property of a hooligan".  It would certainly be refreshing.  :lol:

You've just accurately described the bulk of my collection...

Posted
21 hours ago, PhilipKT said:

Advertisers love using terms that mean nothing.

In the case of the Tarisio's "School of Van Gogh" violin, I believe that was very descriptive.  One ear of the scroll was missing.

Posted
2 hours ago, Richf said:

In the case of the Tarisio's "School of Van Gogh" violin, I believe that was very descriptive.  One ear of the scroll was missing.

The left ear of the scroll...I have gone for School of Getty.

Posted
On 10/29/2021 at 12:46 AM, Kim852 said:

I always get irritated by those terms such as “fine” “good” “interesting” “important” or even “property of a lady”

I think they are really unnecessary as the descriptive terms of the lots 

Glad to see Tarisio has abandoned this in the recent auctions 

Those terms presumably came from Sothebys and Christies.

I would suggest to divide the lots into reliably certified items and uncertified items. Better descriptions of the condition would be helpful too. 

 

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...