Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Violin maker ID help and info please


Inthedark

Recommended Posts

IMG_20210830_115058.thumb.jpg.2e174f4ee0d8e94b62b69dc3a50add3e.jpgHello all. This is my first post so please be kind. I have a violin (handed down to me) labelled H. DERAZEY and in very good condition. I can find some info online but aware the name was bought and continued after his death. Any info on what those more knowledgeable than me think of this violin would be great. I've played for 30 years, although wouldn't consider myself proficient by any stretch, even so this instrument sounds beautiful (compared with a copy strad which was until now my favourite). 

I will attempt to attach some photos. 

Thank you in advance. 

IMG_20210830_115252.jpg

IMG_20210830_115139.jpg

IMG_20210830_115132.jpg

IMG_20210830_115119.jpg

IMG_20210828_195357.jpg

IMG_20210828_195500.jpg

IMG_20210828_195441.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, J-G said:

Yes it certainly is.

The OP may also own a car.  Should we ask about that too? :angry:

:-) if the car sounds good and came with the violin, sure. However, how often does a car come with a violin?  
Not often enough… probably rarely enough that your comment is silly, but my question was not.. and the OP shared photos of both her bows with me, and I was grateful. So yes, the violin came with not one but two bows. What a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do own a car, but hoping this violin is better built than the merc! 

For those knowledgeable about bows too, here are some photos. 

Does anyone know if ancient looking strings made of English gut are worth using? Came with the violin. 

Thank you all for your comments.

 

IMG_20210830_174118.jpg

IMG_20210830_174129.jpg

IMG_20210830_174020.jpg

IMG_20210830_174159.jpg

IMG_20210830_190517.jpg

IMG_20210830_191140.jpg

IMG_20210831_181115.jpg

IMG_20210831_155121.jpg

IMG_20210831_181834.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2021 at 12:17 PM, Inthedark said:

IMG_20210830_115058.thumb.jpg.2e174f4ee0d8e94b62b69dc3a50add3e.jpgHello all. This is my first post so please be kind. I have a violin (handed down to me) labelled H. DERAZEY and in very good condition. I can find some info online but aware the name was bought and continued after his death. Any info on what those more knowledgeable than me think of this violin would be great. I've played for 30 years, although wouldn't consider myself proficient by any stretch, even so this instrument sounds beautiful (compared with a copy strad which was until now my favourite).

 

It's a very nice looking violin.

I wonder if it isn't slightly better than a Mangenot, but I just don't know enough about Derazeys to be sure. There was quite a long period post-Vuillaume where demand slightly outstripped his ability to make them, so maybe this is one of those "Derazey Workshop" instruments.

What is the back length? The genuine examples are often oversized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, martin swan said:

It's a very nice looking violin.

I wonder if it isn't slightly better than a Mangenot, but I just don't know enough about Derazeys to be sure. There was quite a long period post-Vuillaume where demand slightly outstripped his ability to make them, so maybe this is one of those "Derazey Workshop" instruments.

What is the back length? The genuine examples are often oversized.

Thank you. It measures 362mm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shelbow said:

Looks like a very low quality modern Chinese bow out of some random wood and a German trade bow also not great quality probably out of Abeille.

Indeed, the quality of the bows doesn't relate in any way to the quality of the violin. 

I think it's a bad idea to assume that bows can tell us anything about violins or vice versa. Particularly with auction "finds", since so many dodgy dealers put together packages which will appeal to the naive buyer ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Wood Butcher said:

You could at least have had a go at the easier of the two to identify, couldn't you?

Well they both look very cheap but one of them looks modern, probably Chinese, with a half lined frog. Silver mounted, though, So maybe it is a better class of student bow? The other is old, worn, nickel it looks different from Pernambuco. There was another comment saying it was maybe Abielle And that’s what I thought, or maybe snakewood, but I don’t know enough about wood to comment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, martin swan said:

Indeed, the quality of the bows doesn't relate in any way to the quality of the violin. 

I think it's a bad idea to assume that bows can tell us anything about violins or vice versa. Particularly with auction "finds", since so many dodgy dealers put together packages which will appeal to the naive buyer ...

Yes Martin I understand that, but when you find a real instrument that has really been in the closet for 50 years, then presumably the bow has also been in the closet for 50 years alongside the violin. The example that you mention, of crooked dealers making a package designed to fool people, is very real and very common, But you never know when you’re going to find the real thing, so there’s no reason not to look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Wood Butcher said:

Silver?! No, that is chrome :rolleyes:

That is not silver? The tarnish made it look like silver, well that makes me feel better, because the bow looks cheap But I was giving it points for being silver mounted. Thank you very much,  Herr Professor!

Edited by PhilipKT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all. So I took the violin and bows to a local luthier today. He was absolutely stunned by the quality of the instrument. He has worked on H. Derazey before but said this was better by a long way. He also said he'd previously played on the Huberman strad and this instrument would sing on a par with that. I'm not sure if that's a compliment to Derazey or if strad is over rated, but either way I'd best get my standard of playing up!

As well as being oversized in body, it also weighs a lot less than other violins. 

As for the bows, one is cheap. The other would be decent but has lost its flex. So not in great shape. I will invest in a decent bow at some point. 

I had to ask the question. Should this violin go to my 10 year old to learn to play on, as was originally intended. The luthier's answer was a resounding no! 

Thanks all for your thoughts and help. I'm not any closer to a value but I'm keeping it so it doesn't matter. Just want it to sound beautiful and be loved and played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...