Do you like an antiqued finish on a new instrument?


Do you like an antiqued finish on a new instrument?  

55 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like an antiqued finish on a new instrument?

    • Yes. I love most antiqued finishes!
      11
    • Yes, but only a certain type.
      20
    • No. A new instrument should look new.
      24


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No. I believe a varnish should be extremely tough and hard enough  to resist fingernail scratches. And thin and flexible enough to allow the player to get the sounds they want.

It should also have an illusion of depth and enhance the natural chattoyance of the wood.

It should not have so much pigment that it detracts from any of the above features. And what pigment it  does have should appear to be floating in the varnish.

Trying to imitate a fragile varnish is not my cup of tea.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, of course not.  Heaven only knows what damage beating a violin with keys or stabbing it with a screwdriver does to all that careful graduation that they claim to do nowadays, and making it look funny might traumatize it.  :ph34r:

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, rudall said:

Not with those questions. 

No? Why not?

So far we have 3:1 preferring antiqued finishes. If I were selling violins, I'd want to know that.

Once I know that - I can query further...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve been told by the shops that sell violin family instruments that 90 percent of buyers prefer antiqued . I don’t know if that’s accurate but it’s  what they think that matters . I think antiquing can show off the wood better than straight varnished . Also having some wear already from new doesn’t hurt as bad when the inevitable ding happens . 

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, martin swan said:

Antiqueing is far more popular in the US than in the UK ...

The problem with polls is that people can answer and yet be wrong - this is why democracy is in chaos.

People can be VERY wrong. Polls can lead to votes,  and influence the thinking of those who Are fence sitters, it happens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally, I prefer natural.  In fact, when I was shopping for a "new" new instrument a while back, I wanted a mint-condition Strad model.  And, of course, the best thing that came my way was an antiqued del Gesu model.  That was an exception, though.  Most antiqued instruments really don't look good to me.  It's like antiqued Turkish rugs.  They seem fine until you get them home, then they just look a little cheesy.

One nice solution I saw was from a famous German maker.  His finish is designed to look old to the audience, but not to the player.  Ethically sound, and he has a good eye, so it isn't ugly.  Still, I'd still like to see what his best un-distressed varnish looks like.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Edward Byler said:

I’ve been told by the shops that sell violin family instruments that 90 percent of buyers prefer antiqued .

That wouldn't be a surprise. Just about every time most people have encountered  a megabuck violin, the easiest feature to remember is that it looks old and rather beat up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have commissioned a few instruments from different makers in the last little while. What I tell them is to finish it the way their artistic sense tells them to.  I want them to make the instrument as beautiful as they can make it and to follow their own esthetic. I want them to do it the way they feel it.

DLB

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antiquing instruments is like buying pre-ripped jeans. My cello shows a bit of wear, but only a bit, and it’s honest. But seriously folks,  Don’t these look better completely pure without any antiquing?
I agree that some people like antiquing, and I agree with the posters who suggest that some people are wrong.

363060E6-48B0-4EB8-9B0D-33225F4567E2.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PhilipKT said:

Antiquing instruments is like buying pre-ripped jeans. My cello shows a bit of wear, but only a bit, and it’s honest. But seriously folks,  Don’t these look better completely pure without any antiquing?
I agree that some people like antiquing, and I agree with the posters who suggest that some people are wrong.

363060E6-48B0-4EB8-9B0D-33225F4567E2.jpeg

All three of these cello look antiqued to me,. or is that natural wear?

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Don Noon said:

I personally prefer antiqued so that I don't worry about dinging or denting it.  But I prefer new cars to look new.

The faster I work the more mistakes I make. I am trying to incorporate this into a new look , which is an instrument that looks 300 years old but is in very good condition.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.