Don Noon Posted September 21, 2020 Report Share Posted September 21, 2020 6 hours ago, Peter K-G said: We must be all in great need to repeat ourselves For the record I'll repeat: If you want them (M5/B1) to correlate it's possible up to R^2 1.0. (Anders will say that there is something wrong if R^2 1.0 and I will say My data and Wikipedia says that it's possible) To which I'll repeat: So what? Available data shows tha particulart B mode frequencies are not critical for goodness, a particular M5 frequency is not critical for goodness, and a particular relation between plate modes and body modes is not critical for goodness. I can believe that with careful control of humidity, arching, and diddled graduations and bass bar you can get a high correlation between M5 and a B mode... I just don't see why anyone would think it is worth the effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.