Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Is this exclusive to a particular maker?


Garth E.

Recommended Posts

There are 3 nails hammered into the raised back. I've never seen this before. I believe it to be English mid 1700's. This violin needs a lot of money spent on it. I'm sure it fell under a carriage. I can post more later as this violin is truly a mystery. I'm taking this restoration slowly. Really hope I can find some help here without being a pest.

004 (3).JPG

005 (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, Blank face said:

Looks like a very common through neck from Saxony, the high overstand pointing to mid 19th century or later. The nails are most probably an amateurish repair.

I agree with this. We also keep telling people that you can't just post one or two photos, and expect to get a good ID. Follow the guides at the top of the page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FiddleDoug said:

I agree with this. We also keep telling people that you can't just post one or two photos, and expect to get a good ID. Follow the guides at the top of the page.

I should have posted all the photos I apologize for that. I was hoping there would be something about the raised back only that might id it. I've already been to several excellent luthiers for opinions on the whole violin. I was just looking for an opinion on this through neck. Again, very sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hoped I would not get into any controversial issues with my title question. I wasn't asking for a date or a nationality. I had only wanted to know if anyone had seen something like this neck protrusion...anywhere. Sorry again if it looks like I'm after an appraisal, I'm not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since nails will not be original to the instrument, I can't see how it would help to identify anything.

What you are describing as a neck protrusion is known as a through neck. The neck being one piece, with the ribs fitted into the neck root. Rather than having a neck and a separate neck block inside the body. The platform on the back is necessary to glue the neck to.

Through necks are common however, so yes they have been seen before. Many times.
Being a widely used method, it is not exclusive to a particular maker or place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Wood Butcher said:

Since nails will not be original to the instrument, I can't see how it would help to identify anything.

What you are describing as a neck protrusion is known as a through neck. The neck being one piece, with the ribs fitted into the neck root. Rather than having a neck and a separate neck block inside the body. The platform on the back is necessary to glue the neck to.

Through necks are common however, so yes they have been seen before. Many times.
Being a widely used method, it is not exclusive to a particular maker or place.

Thank-you, I think that is exactly what I was looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I guess there is a chance it might be far away from what you think it is, and I can imagine that this could be concerning if there is money invested in it. But I think its always good to know for sure, it's good for educational purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Shelbow said:

Well I guess there is a chance it might be far away from what you think it is, and I can imagine that this could be concerning if there is money invested in it. But I think its always good to know for sure, it's good for educational purposes.

When I was looking for a 18th c. violin I knew I was a little out of my depth. However what is in my knowledge based wheelhouse was the script. I studied it long with also a few other learned opinions that felt the inscription authentic. Not sure if Brompton's holds any weight here, but I did send photos to them for their opinion, John Egan and another specialist valued it at twice what I paid and said it was a very interesting instrument. Had it been a German piece of crap, they would have stated that. I had sent other photos of other violins to them where they did just that. One common thread that every luthier I've talked has said they do think it's very old. Probably English, possibly German. Learning about this violin is why I'm here. I can handle the truth. I just need to get to know everyone a little better.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2020 at 1:03 PM, Shelbow said:

Well sounds positive from the feedback you have got so far so don't be worried.

There are a lot of identification requests on here so people are quite blunt with their opinions, it's all useful info though.

I think what I did was put my helmet on a stick and just raised it slowly over the trench. Rather than just jump over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shelbow said:

 

There are a lot of identification requests on here so people are quite blunt with their opinions

One can only say what they think, if they are confident of an accurate identification.
It might not be what the person asking was hoping to hear, but there aren't many ways to try to dress that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s quite right that we can’t identify neither a particular feature nor a whole violin by a single feature, therefore other posters were pointed to this often before.

It’s not very convincing nor polite to tell something like “I didn’t ask for an identification, just for one feature”, exactly this was discussed some days ago, too.

What we can see at the photos are the odd repair and an altered throughneck with a shape (high overstand) which would be very unusual for a pre mid 19th century date, to say it more conservative. It would be very unusual (though not completely impossible) to find such a neck construction outside the Saxon/West Bohemian region. If you’re doubting this, it’s impossible to check it without seeing more and detailed photos.

Inscriptions inside violins aren’t unusual at all, too, especially such ascribing the instrument to much older origins than they really are, and the writers also often are showing high skills to imitate ancient styles of lettering to make them more believable.

So it is impossible to hear more opinions about the instrument (to the risk you won’t like them) without showing more pictures or you keep it safe and uncommented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an early 19th Century English or Scottish violin with a similar through neck. I also see what might be a Lockey Hill-style gouge in the back plate, although it's a bit oblong and far from the center of the plate compared to what I've seen.

The inscription is nonsense, as the last of the Amati had been dead for 16 years in 1756, and the method used to build this fiddle would have been alien to anyone with that surname.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the photos, now it looks much more interesting than I was assuming. 
More questions: Is the scroll fluted to the absolute end at the front, and is there a groove for the ribs at the bottom?

Could you take flush straight side views of the scroll, bird views of the rib corners/rib joints and the inside bottom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2020 at 3:14 PM, Blank face said:

Thanks for the photos, now it looks much more interesting than I was assuming. 
More questions: Is the scroll fluted to the absolute end at the front, and is there a groove for the rid at the bottom?

Could you take flush straight side views of the scroll, bird views of the rib corners/rib joints and the inside bottom?

 Give me a little time to set that up. Thanks.

Hope these are ok. The fluting on the front of the scroll goes under all the way, as far as it can. I could not see a groove for the bottom plate.

001.JPG

002.JPG

003 (3).JPG

002 (2).JPG

003 (4).JPG

004 (4).JPG

005 (3).JPG

007 (3).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2020 at 3:13 PM, Three13 said:

I have an early 19th Century English or Scottish violin with a similar through neck. I also see what might be a Lockey Hill-style gouge in the back plate, although it's a bit oblong and far from the center of the plate compared to what I've seen.

The inscription is nonsense, as the last of the Amati had been dead for 16 years in 1756, and the method used to build this fiddle would have been alien to anyone with that surname.

Thanks for that info. Of course that Amati thing is nonsense. Antonio died around 1607? Anyway, I read it as "in the style of" It's also signed by Alex MacVean from Anoch Scotland in 1930.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that the ribs are in a groove in the back so could this be French with a rare through neck ?

Maybe the maker put the inscription in as a homage to Amati .

Is it normal for a back groove construction violin to have a one piece bottom rib  ?

Do some of the pegs have a monogram on the end grain or is it  just a trick of the  light ?

Are the rib ends mitered ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...