hannaz Posted January 26, 2020 Report Share Posted January 26, 2020 (edited) Hello, Is the violin from the photos fake or could it be an authentic Leandro Bisiach violin? I’ve tried to compare it to instruments on tarisio but it’s hard to do when you don’t know what to look for. Edited January 26, 2020 by hannaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight Brown Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 It is at least interesting. DLB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Three13 Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 I don't see anything in these pictures that resembles a Bisiach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilipKT Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 Nice looking violin, whatever it is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mysticpaw Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 What's with all the varnish chipping on the bass side of the tailpiece ? … never seen so much before on a not too old violin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Three13 Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 It looks Albani-influenced to me. Better pictures would help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wood Butcher Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 Not a Bisiach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hannaz Posted January 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 Thank you, everyone, it's really interesting. I'm curious, what is the giveaway that it's not a Bisiach or what makes it interesting? If it's not something that you'd like to share on a public forum perhaps you could send a dm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicolas Temino Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 Not a L. Bisiach at all. That edgework does not fit (but maybe the angle of the pics). But an interesting one indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porteroso Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 6 hours ago, hannaz said: Thank you, everyone, it's really interesting. I'm curious, what is the giveaway that it's not a Bisiach or what makes it interesting? If it's not something that you'd like to share on a public forum perhaps you could send a dm? There is a stickied thread on this forum detailing what pictures are needed for a decent internet evaluation. If you will take the pictures, many members here love to work through what a violin like this may be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hannaz Posted January 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Porteroso said: There is a stickied thread on this forum detailing what pictures are needed for a decent internet evaluation. If you will take the pictures, many members here love to work through what a violin like this may be. I saw that thread, but the photos are from a craigslist-type website where it's listed as a Bisiach. I really like the look of this violin but wanted to at least partially verify it before I travel to try it. There were two more photos that I attach now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wood Butcher Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 “Interesting” is used to describe things when people don’t know what they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicolas Temino Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Wood Butcher said: “Interesting” is used to describe things when people don’t know what they are. Or when a thing does not look like the standard Markie thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wood Butcher Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Nicolas Temino said: Or when a thing does not look like the standard Markie thing. Even when that is exactly what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank face Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 The first point to exclude Bisiach is the built on the back construction with pinched rib joints, and all other features defining it as a "Standard Markie", i. e. a product of the Markneukirchen/Schönbach cottage industry roughly around 1900. The only thing being a bit different is the antiquing with acid, leading to the somehow clowdy appearance of the varnish in the lower bouts, a bit like the French Caussin school, that's all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin swan Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 Huge and messy button repair ... Agree with Blank Face that this is German making a bit of an effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hannaz Posted January 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 I’m impressed how knowledgeable people here are. And willing to share their knowledge too. Are there books or websites with pictures showing how, for example, different rib joints look? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank face Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 5 hours ago, hannaz said: I saw that thread, but the photos are from a craigslist-type website where it's listed as a Bisiach. I really like the look of this violin but wanted to at least partially verify it before I travel to try it. There were two more photos that I attach now In this photos it looks a bit more French/Caussin alike, but the scroll and the ff with wide notches seem to point to Markneukirchen/Schönbach. But however it won't make much of a difference, and definitely no Bisiach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank face Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 2 hours ago, martin swan said: Huge and messy button repair ... I can't see this repair, in fact can't see much of the button at all? If the condition is good, not a bad violin, but the price should be accordingly to a "not Bisiach". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin swan Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Blank face said: I can't see this repair, in fact can't see much of the button at all? Huge area of new varnish travelling a third of the way down the back from the button ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wood Butcher Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 As gruesome and strange as that area looks, it could be part of the brutal antiquing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violadamore Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 6 hours ago, Wood Butcher said: “Interesting” is used to describe things when people don’t know what they are. Not always. Sometimes it's simply more diplomatic than giving an accurate description. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Cramer Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 Could someone please comment on the wood? I'm really intrigued by the back, because the upper region looks flamed but the lower looks almost quilted. Also the wide grain of the table is very cool. People say this is Markneukirchen/Schönbach ca. 1900: I didn't realize that those makers used such interesting wood! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Carlson Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 The label is identical to the reproduction in the René Vannes - Dictionnaire Universel des Luthiers (n. 156 in the Fac-Similés des Etiquettes). Someone showed some creativity by transforming 1896 into 1899. The rest is totally identical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wood Butcher Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 5 hours ago, Al Cramer said: Could someone please comment on the wood? I'm really intrigued by the back, because the upper region looks flamed but the lower looks almost quilted. Also the wide grain of the table is very cool. People say this is Markneukirchen/Schönbach ca. 1900: I didn't realize that those makers used such interesting wood! The back is maple, which is slab cut. The figure is fairly typical for a slab back, nothing unusual. Again, the spruce is nothing unexpected either. If you get a chance to see more violins from this area, you will come to realise it is typical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.