Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Thoughts on this Violin


Newfiddleguy
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, tradfiddle said:

Suspect x.jpeg

Matthias Thir 1779_Hopfner.jpg

I think Jacob pointed out quite clearly why it's useless to compare with one singular and particular KuK model out of many different. There were also examples with very squarish shoulders, f.e. here https://www.khm.at/en/give-and-join/adopt-a-masterpiece/find-your-favorite-object/violine/ and others more falling, hooked and rounded ff etc. etc. Actuall nobody will find out anymore if the OP was Moravian, Bohemian, Hungarian, Carpathian or whatever regions produced violins.

A good lesson not to mention names as example for certain features, somebody will come along trying to nail you (sigh).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blank Face - fair enough, we've both fallen into this trap... The problem is, we can't rely on the scroll being original, the varnish has been changed, the ff's have potentially been fiddled with, and we don't have the instrument in our hands to get a good feel of the arching and sight of the interior. So we have been chasing a few breadcrumbs in a very wide wood! Time to draw a line under this one I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...