MikeV Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 Are violin revarnish obvious? Does crazing hit at a revarnish?
Nick Allen Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 Do you mean like stripping the original varnish all of the way off and then revarnishing? If so, then yes, those jobs are usually pretty obvious. Or do you mean simply varnishing over old varnish? Which could cause craquelature/crazing.
Thomas Coleman Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 5 minutes ago, Nick Allen said: Do you mean like stripping the original varnish all of the way off and then revarnishing? If so, then yes, those jobs are usually pretty obvious. Or do you mean simply varnishing over old varnish? Which could cause craquelature/crazing. I disagree about a stripped/re-varnished instrument looking obviously stripped and re-varnished. 1 hour ago, MikeV said: Are violin revarnish obvious? Does crazing hit at a revarnish? I don't think crazing hints at a revarnish unless, like Nick said, one type of varnish was overcoated with another type of varnish. I don't think stripping and re-varnishing lead to crazing.
martin swan Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 1 hour ago, MikeV said: Are violin revarnish obvious? Does crazing hit at a revarnish? It's not possible to say anything from a small detail like this. The ways you would know a violin was revarnished : 1. the vanish is not right for the maker 2. the varnish appears much newer than the violin must be 3. we see traces of a different colour in the runout of the table grain and in other inaccessible parts like the inside of the scroll turns Many original varnishes have light or heavy craquelure.
Nick Allen Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 3 hours ago, Thomas Coleman said: I disagree about a stripped/re-varnished instrument looking obviously stripped and re-varnished. Okay, perhaps I'm imagining bad revarnish jobs.
MikeV Posted May 26, 2019 Author Report Posted May 26, 2019 Was wondering what thing to look for. I was looking at the violin above and didn't look like an obvious revarnish, but was told it was suspected to have been revarnished. In the particular case of this violin, I think a coat may have been added, but not sure.
martin swan Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 Many violins have a "coat of clear" on top of the original varnish. US shops in particular have done this traditionally, even to Strads and del Gesus. people like shiny violins ....
The Violin Beautiful Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 Some clues that a violin has been revarnished: -Mismatched varnish on different parts (sometimes it’s just bad retouching, though) -Traces of an original varnish at the corners and in the c bouts or in the recesses of the scroll and by the neck mortise -Marks from a scraper or even sandpaper that go partly into the ground and are clearly not brush strokes. -As Martin Swan said, wrong varnish for the maker.
MikeV Posted May 27, 2019 Author Report Posted May 27, 2019 16 hours ago, martin swan said: Many violins have a "coat of clear" on top of the original varnish. US shops in particular have done this traditionally, even to Strads and del Gesus. people like shiny violins .... Yes they do. How much does this clear coat affect the instrument? Is removal practical?
martin swan Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 Yes, removal is possible but it's a very very slow job involving tiny scraping actions with a scalpel. The best plan is to find a buyer who wants a shiny violin.
PhilipKT Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 Well reading this series of comments a question came in my head. Would an expert re-varnish improve the sound? Or is it impossible to tell? As I understand it the varnish is supposed to be able to protect the wood while still allowing the wood to flex, so a bad varnish would interfere with sound but a good varnish would not.
The Violin Beautiful Posted May 27, 2019 Report Posted May 27, 2019 27 minutes ago, PhilipKT said: Well reading this series of comments a question came in my head. Would an expert re-varnish improve the sound? Or is it impossible to tell? As I understand it the varnish is supposed to be able to protect the wood while still allowing the wood to flex, so a bad varnish would interfere with sound but a good varnish would not. If the original varnish was poor and rather thick, a better varnish applied properly could drastically improve the sound. However, removing varnish negates much of the original value. It’s very heavily frowned upon for any instrument by an individual maker or considered fine. There’s less concern about revarnishing cheap factory instruments, where a good revarnishing job and a professional setup can actually increase value. There’s a fine line to be treaded trepidatiously, and failure to do so can seriously ruin a reputation.
martin swan Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 So you are asking about this violin https://www.ebay.com/itm/Ernst-Heinrich-Roth-Violin-1923-with-2-bows-in-old-case/264336986588?hash=item3d8bb651dc:g:XBgAAOSwmXlc6Y1K This is stripped and revarnished.
MikeV Posted June 1, 2019 Author Report Posted June 1, 2019 On 5/30/2019 at 12:34 PM, martin swan said: So you are asking about this violin https://www.ebay.com/itm/Ernst-Heinrich-Roth-Violin-1923-with-2-bows-in-old-case/264336986588?hash=item3d8bb651dc:g:XBgAAOSwmXlc6Y1K This is stripped and revarnished. How can you tell it's stripped and revarnished?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now