Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
11 minutes ago, ClefLover said:

Based upon the inside corner pictured, are there no corner blocks?  It’s darkened in the corner, but not where the linings/ribs are...

Here are the pics;)

03A5633D-150F-4843-9461-5E291DAAA3E8.jpeg

B018A76E-38F5-4649-A6AD-C0B2C37F4EEC.jpeg

3CC7EA4E-A59B-453A-A379-63E035AC938F.jpeg

D9DAB5A8-5405-4EFB-A339-0D3093B13085.jpeg

927A3B34-248D-42BE-9F03-7ED0A279F38A.jpeg

Posted

I have no idea what the name says, but the construction seems unconventional. Mitres to the upper and lower bouts,strange top and bottom blocks. I guess it all adds up to autodidact (amateur) made. The fingerboard looks to be rosewood,so maybe that's a clue to its country of origin ? maybe it has a through neck ?

Posted
15 minutes ago, Rue said:

I vote for Portobello - maybe he was thinking of dinner at the time...

Mmmm... I would have written the same.  I love Portobellos!  

25 minutes ago, Delabo said:

I have no idea what the name says, but the construction seems unconventional. Mitres to the upper and lower bouts,strange top and bottom blocks. I guess it all adds up to autodidact (amateur) made. The fingerboard looks to be rosewood,so maybe that's a clue to its country of origin ? maybe it has a through neck ?

The delta on the pegbox is about as big as I’ve ever seen!  My guess is Portoferraio, Italy.  As that is a port city, maybe it is a multi-cultural instrument with parts being from all over the region. 

Posted
5 hours ago, ClefLover said:

Mmmm... I would have written the same.  I love Portobellos!  

The delta on the pegbox is about as big as I’ve ever seen!  My guess is Portoferraio, Italy.  As that is a port city, maybe it is a multi-cultural instrument with parts being from all over the region. 

They were three men and three trees. The three men decided to cross the world with a pièce of three différent trees. And when they arrived by chance in the same port, they. Decided to make a viola, and this port was... PORTOFERRAIO;)

 

Posted

To me it appears, G Porte aSielo,  afielo,, afelo, afaelo,afeio, 

G porte/ , seems to be ok ? No ? 

but at this time, after the  votes, we don’t know the name  of the president! ;) 

Posted

I think it says Pete Faris. You remember crazy Pete Faris, right? Spent 6 months trying to write his name on the inside of a violin through the f-holes? Yeah, that crazy Pete. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, glebert said:

I think it says Pete Faris. You remember crazy Pete Faris, right? Spent 6 months trying to write his name on the inside of a violin through the f-holes? Yeah, that crazy Pete. 

;););) !!!!    LOL

Finally my daughter, ten years old helped me, and now I think : GAorde  ———afilio afilis ???  

 

Posted

The wood looks like half-slabcut birdseye maple in my eyes, sometimes seen at late 19th rather tradey instruments. The OP looks as if roughly from this period.

It has a through neck with a very distinguished carved "foot", but other details like the rib joints (prob. clamped and build on the back) more roughly, as well as the teethed plane marks at the outside ribs and the squarish bottom patches, the head and pegbox more roughly, too. This all points IMO to an autodidactical maker without any local tradition, so it could be made elsewhere. So it can be difficult to find the very blurred name registred somewhere in a violin makers dictionary.

Posted

It's also rather dangerous to assume that a signature on the inside of the table belongs to the maker. More likely a repairer ...

Most self-taught makers are either inordinately proud of their work (big label) or slightly ashamed (no label).

Posted
3 hours ago, martin swan said:

It's also rather dangerous to assume that a signature on the inside of the table belongs to the maker. More likely a repairer ...

Most self-taught makers are either inordinately proud of their work (big label) or slightly ashamed (no label).

Right Martin! , and your suggestion lead me to think that this is the name of the reparer. Look at the back of the table. Further more, it is probably the name of table’s maker. The table appears to be a recent work ,she has  not big  sign of use, wich is not the case of the belly. The body of the instrument had been totaly revarnished. The neck and back in my opinion would be from the XVII, with good signs of use on the belly, and of tools on the neck. The neck is of course « baroque » only glued (so not XVIII ), and the way it is done show that they were not as many rules  as later. Not an « amateur » but an unknown maker. 

You lead me to scrute the « paperwood » . In fact it is the original  label: I can see M.H faciat , or something like this, I go very carefuly for cleaning, I don’t like this, I fear the consequences of that. 

Let’s look at the pics. 

FEA484AB-894A-4F3B-A1FD-826BF3A5A9AC.jpeg

E1EFD490-6F72-41B1-A657-1F61E1AC7D2A.jpeg

A028DDC4-1374-4E7A-98B2-F955333538FF.jpeg

F7EED2EE-F295-4D13-8B66-194047363867.jpeg

CC4E2AB0-CA24-41FE-96FA-763C4B879573.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...