Andreas Preuss Posted March 31, 2018 Report Posted March 31, 2018 Content (the first figure (001 etc.) refers to the page the second figure refers to the number of my own posts. 001-1.1 Part 1 Building the experimental super light violin ————————— 008.100.1 Part 2 Debugging the sound, birth of the model of the NEW CONCEPT VIOLIN 008-100.1 Outlining possible changes for eliminating the over resonance of the low strings Experimental alterations 009-104.1 fernambuko neck 009-105.1 diminish interior air volume 009-106.1 Doubling the linings. 009-109.1 The Bayon Bass Bar 009-112.1 first rib height reduction 009-113.1 cross bars at the top side c bouts 010-116.1 overview of the previous alterations 010-119.1 x-shaped bass bar 010-121.1 trimming the x-shaped bass bar 010-123. weight reduction at edge and other places coming down 297g 010-125.1 bent top plate arriving at lowest weight of 286g 012-135.1 description of main points of the new concept (at this stage) 012-136.1 flat walnut back 136.3 one string tailpiece 012-137.1 discussing main problems (too viola like sound) and further possible alterations 012-144.1 experiment replacing the back with paper 012-148.1 string angle adjustment 012-149.1 sound comparison test of four instruments including the NCV 013-150.1 comparison of same instruments for each string alone (G D A E) 013-154.1 new (arched) back 013-157.1 enlarging upper block massively 013-159.1 further adjustments with sound post, bridge and tailpiece 161.3 adding to the x-shaped bass bar two ‘legs’ pointing to the top and lower block 013-162.1 making a bigger lower block 013-164.1 building the arched rib garland, first convex surface for the top plate 014-170.1 making concave rib surface for the back 014-174.1 final result with mp4 sound sample which can be downloaded. 014-177.1 summary and outlook on future challenges —————————- 014 - 180.1 Part 3 Building the first New Concept Violin based on the experimental insights. ————— 001-1.1 This thread is about building a violin which doesn't follow a symmetric outline for ergonomic purposes. At the same time the weight was initially kept at the bare minimum to find out in which parts of a violin mass and accompanying stiffness is needed to produce a 'good' sound. 1.2 It was the idea that starting from unconvential patterns and working with a different concept would necessarily and automatically lead to failure. Thus this would have become additional proof to the idea that the violin seen as a concept of classical makers can't be improved. While this seemed to be true at the beginning, it came clear in the continuation of various constructional experiments, that a different construction concept at least seems to be possible. 1.3 As said, it was in the first place not the goal to produce a violin with 'superior' sound characteristics but while experimenting with the violin useful hypothesis were elaborated to link constructional features with various characteristics of the sound. Princples were tested and judged by playing the instrument as well as recording sound spectra for objective comparison. 1.4 Currently this project finds itself at the turning point from being merely experimental. (Andreas Preuss, Tokyo, 2021/5/11) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.5 Though the original introduction of this thread has outlived itself, I believe that the general mindset is still valid. Serious violin making must not always follow already explored paths and even if there is the risk of making something foolish, there is ALWAYS the benefit of learning from unusual experiences. Everything below is the unaltered original text of this thread: 1.6 Here you can follow me constructing the super-light violin. It will be the craziest thing I ever made and please don't take it too seriously. It is the violin maker joke from my workshop. But at least I am serious enough to make it the most professional way I can imagine. So following the footprints of Antonio Stradivari everything starts with a drawing. I decided to throw over board symmetry as well and came up with the funny design below. To save weight the length is only 351mm and all distortions follow the 10 percent rule which means that one f-hole is 10 percent longer than the other.
Jim Bress Posted March 31, 2018 Report Posted March 31, 2018 Andreas, you starting a bench thread is an unexpected pleasant surprise. I look forward to following it. Is there actually a 10% rule or is it just a SWAG (scientific wild a$$ guess)? -Jim
Don Noon Posted March 31, 2018 Report Posted March 31, 2018 I should have mentioned this previous thread before about making a ridiculously lightweight fiddle. It's not done by a high-level maker, but there might be something in it to think about. If the goal is to see how light you can go, then using a small body and messing with the geometry makes sense. If the goal is only to get down to 350g or so, I think it could easily be done with a normal, larger body.
Andreas Preuss Posted March 31, 2018 Author Report Posted March 31, 2018 On 3/31/2018 at 5:35 AM, Jim Bress said: Andreas, you starting a bench thread is an unexpected pleasant surprise. I look forward to following it. Is there actually a 10% rule or is it just a SWAG (scientific wild a$$ guess)? -Jim 001-2.1 Jim, when you sit at the design desk, you get easily taken away by too extreme thoughts. The hugest difference in the length of treble side f-hole versus bass side f-hole I know of is the Cannon with something like 2mm difference making roughly 2.5% difference. So first I designed at 5% difference but this was not visible enough so I went to 10% and applied this rule more or less to the circles in the design. For the head I thought it would be fun to use the pattern of the Leduc del Gesu because it doesn't have so much material around the volute. And again I will diminish the overall proportions by 8%. 10% looked a little bit too small.
Andreas Preuss Posted March 31, 2018 Author Report Posted March 31, 2018 On 3/31/2018 at 7:21 AM, Don Noon said: I should have mentioned this previous thread before about making a ridiculously lightweight fiddle. It's not done by a high-level maker, but there might be something in it to think about. If the goal is to see how light you can go, then using a small body and messing with the geometry makes sense. If the goal is only to get down to 350g or so, I think it could easily be done with a normal, larger body. 001-3.1 Actually I have looked into his thread before. Quite audacious! And he didn't cheat about the results so I will take some too radical recipes as a warning.
Emilg Posted March 31, 2018 Report Posted March 31, 2018 Fascinating Andreas! I really like these threads and experiments....proof 'n pudding 'n stuff hopefully you can make some video's with a good player playing it when it's finished.
Andreas Preuss Posted March 31, 2018 Author Report Posted March 31, 2018 On 3/31/2018 at 10:15 AM, Emilg said: Fascinating Andreas! I really like these threads and experiments....proof 'n pudding 'n stuff hopefully you can make some video's with a good player playing it when it's finished. 001-4.1 I have actually a kind of dream for this violin: I want to donate it to the community of violin players as a 'messenger for a good cause'. Any professional violinist is eligible to play on it under 2 conditions: The entire revenue of the concert shall be given to a good cause of the violinist's own choice and each time the violin is played a commissioned fun piece by a contemporary composer must be in the program. After the concert the violinist puts his signature on the instrument and, if the organization receiving the donation agrees, their logo as well. Anyone is free to contact violinists to arrange a performance. 4.2 In real terms those concerts can be for example the Generalprobe for a serious recital.
Emilg Posted March 31, 2018 Report Posted March 31, 2018 17 minutes ago, Andreas Preuss said: I have actually a kind of dream for this violin: I want to donate it to the community of violin players as a 'messenger for a good cause'. Any professional violinist is eligible to play on it under 2 conditions: The entire revenue of the concert shall be given to a good cause of the violinist's own choice and each time the violin is played a commissioned fun piece by a contemporary composer must be in the program. After the concert the violinist puts his signature on the instrument and, if the organization receiving the donation agrees, their logo as well. Anyone is free to contact violinists to arrange a performance. In real terms those concerts can be for example the Generalprobe for a serious recital. that sounds like a really nice plan, hopefully the violin turns out to be a good one i dont know if Japan has a vast community of players, otherwise you can try South Korea ...
Andreas Preuss Posted March 31, 2018 Author Report Posted March 31, 2018 On 3/31/2018 at 4:08 PM, Emilg said: that sounds like a really nice plan, hopefully the violin turns out to be a good one i dont know if Japan has a vast community of players, otherwise you can try South Korea ... 001-5.1 Players in Japan are extremely conservative. But this offer is for players world wide and if you know someone, let me know!
Andreas Preuss Posted March 31, 2018 Author Report Posted March 31, 2018 001-6.1 Got a nice nickname for the project now (after a few beers with friends) STRDIVARIS REVENGE.
Emilg Posted March 31, 2018 Report Posted March 31, 2018 2 hours ago, Andreas Preuss said: Got a nice nickname for the project now (after a few beers with friends) STRDIVARIS REVENGE. you could make a documentary about the project, a bit like the movie 'Strad style'
Andreas Preuss Posted April 3, 2018 Author Report Posted April 3, 2018 On 3/31/2018 at 9:29 PM, Emilg said: you could make a documentary about the project, a bit like the movie 'Strad style' 001-7.1 I wished a day had 48 hours and I would immediately jump on it. But maybe I can make a film clip not more than 3 minutes.
Emilg Posted April 3, 2018 Report Posted April 3, 2018 12 hours ago, Andreas Preuss said: I wished a day had 48 hours and I would immediately jump on it. But maybe I can make a film clip not more than 3 minutes. i wasnt very serious i hear it's a nice documentary btw (Strad style) any short clip will do, would love to hear it when it's done
Michael Szyper Posted April 3, 2018 Report Posted April 3, 2018 Dear Andreas, very interesting to follow your project. Did you already make decisions about wood densities? (Especially the top and back wood?)
Andreas Preuss Posted April 3, 2018 Author Report Posted April 3, 2018 On 4/3/2018 at 6:52 PM, Michael Szyper said: Dear Andreas, very interesting to follow your project. Did you already make decisions about wood densities? (Especially the top and back wood?) 001-8.1 Michael, usually I use for my copies very dense and rather heavy wood to match the quality of old Cremonese instruments. This time I am going basically the opposite way, so especially for the heavy parts made of maple I am trying to find wood of very low density. In case of the top I am not sure if lightweight spruce such as Engleman spruce is a good idea. I heard somewhere that it doesn't produce the best sound. So for the top I am rather trying to find ways to keep the grain straight and uncut within the plate. Maybe it is possible to partially bend it.
JacksonMaberry Posted April 8, 2018 Report Posted April 8, 2018 On 4/3/2018 at 6:49 PM, Andreas Preuss said: Maybe it is possible to partially bend it. You might as well try bending it all the way - it doesn't take long. https://helenviolinmaker.com/steam-bending-fronts-a-practical-demonstration/ Helen Michetschlager's method isn't like Bill Fulton's. It uses steam/heat to plasticize the wood fibers. By the time the bent plate has dried, the fibers now are set in this new configuration with no tendency to return to the original state. If you don't like it, you can at least say you've tried. Talk to Ben Hebbert about English viol construction. Apparently it was not uncommon to have a central stave bent, flanked by two carved sections. He's got a very successful small viola that was made in this way, or rather produced from cutting down a small gamba. Edit: by the way, it is also possible to use Helen's method to bend the back, though it is perhaps less advantageous.
Andreas Preuss Posted April 8, 2018 Author Report Posted April 8, 2018 On 4/8/2018 at 4:56 AM, JacksonMaberry said: You might as well try bending it all the way - it doesn't take long. https://helenviolinmaker.com/steam-bending-fronts-a-practical-demonstration/ Helen Michetschlager's method isn't like Bill Fulton's. It uses steam/heat to plasticize the wood fibers. By the time the bent plate has dried, the fibers now are set in this new configuration with no tendency to return to the original state. If you don't like it, you can at least say you've tried. Talk to Ben Hebbert about English viol construction. Apparently it was not uncommon to have a central stave bent, flanked by two carved sections. He's got a very successful small viola that was made in this way, or rather produced from cutting down a small gamba. Edit: by the way, it is also possible to use Helen's method to bend the back, though it is perhaps less advantageous. 001-9.1 Jackson, thanks for the link to the explanation how to bend tops. 9.2 I was actually thinking about testing different tops on my super-light violin. At least two carved tops, one with a high arching one with a low arching. 9.3 Looking at the work procedure for the bent top, I don't like so much the idea to make a double edge for the blocks from the beginning. I was wondering as well what would happen if a finished top is made wet from both sides? But I think you are right, it is definitely worth a shot. 9.4 My thoughts of the bent top were rather like making a composite material. If we glue paper on a thin wood board it will bend across the year rings. This could be used to partially bend it crosswise and lengthwise I was thinking of forcing it (not too much) to the ribs) However thinking about how the arching must look like before bending it becomes a sort of a headache.
Don Noon Posted April 8, 2018 Report Posted April 8, 2018 If I ever do a bent top, I'd bend a 50mm wide strip to match the center arch, then glue wings (unbent) to each side. The wings could be slightly off-quarter to follow the slope of the arch a bit. I think the center part is the most important structurally and acoustically, and this way you minimize cutting the longitudinal fibers. The wings are less critical.
Andreas Preuss Posted April 8, 2018 Author Report Posted April 8, 2018 On 4/8/2018 at 4:36 PM, Don Noon said: If I ever do a bent top, I'd bend a 50mm wide strip to match the center arch, then glue wings (unbent) to each side. The wings could be slightly off-quarter to follow the slope of the arch a bit. I think the center part is the most important structurally and acoustically, and this way you minimize cutting the longitudinal fibers. The wings are less critical. 001-10.1 Yes, Don, this was also going around in my mind. I was also thinking about bending the whole top in one direction and making it completely straight along the grain.
JacksonMaberry Posted April 8, 2018 Report Posted April 8, 2018 3 minutes ago, Don Noon said: If I ever do a bent top, I'd bend a 50mm wide strip to match the center arch, then glue wings (unbent) to each side. The wings could be slightly off-quarter to follow the slope of the arch a bit. I think the center part is the most important structurally and acoustically, and this way you minimize cutting the longitudinal fibers. The wings are less critical. You'd be in good company with Richard Meares.
thirteenthsteph Posted April 8, 2018 Report Posted April 8, 2018 I'd be interested in a super-light viola right now! Violins are light enough.
JacksonMaberry Posted April 8, 2018 Report Posted April 8, 2018 1 hour ago, thirteenthsteph said: I'd be interested in a super-light viola right now! Violins are light enough. Talk to Marty.
Don Noon Posted April 8, 2018 Report Posted April 8, 2018 8 hours ago, Andreas Preuss said: Yes, Don, this was also going around in my mind. I was also thinking about bending the whole top in one direction and making it completely straight along the grain. I think you'd run into trouble trying to bend a 16mm thick slab. Or you'd have to have variable height ribs.
Andreas Preuss Posted April 10, 2018 Author Report Posted April 10, 2018 On 4/8/2018 at 8:21 PM, thirteenthsteph said: I'd be interested in a super-light viola right now! Violins are light enough. 001-11.1 How light is a super light viola? My lightest viola so far weighted 515g and has a 405mm body length Albani model.
Andreas Preuss Posted April 10, 2018 Author Report Posted April 10, 2018 001-12.1 Because I am planning to build composite ribs from very thin maple reinforced with paper, silk or something similar I need an outer mould to assemble the ribs. The counterparts had to be chalk fitted and to prevent the ribs getting glued to the form I covered it with clear tape. For the corner blocks I am planning to use balsa wood. I was thinking long how to make the linings and finally decided that it is structurally best to make it like some Italian guitar maker luthiers: so they will just continue over the corner blocks.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now