Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Violin ID? 18th Century?


mmmm
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dear experts (and others ;), I recently acquired this violin which is truly excellent sounding...and I'm wondering if any of you had some thoughts on origin or even maker.  It has a label inside which I assume is bogus:  "Mathias Thier, fecit, Viennae Anno 17..."  It also has a W.E.Hill and Sons stamp on the fingerboard G738 (which I guess may, or may not, refer to the violin).  I've seen what the Hills wrote about it, but thought I'd get some opinions before revealing that.  Thanks in advance!

And apologies for my louy pictures...IMG_6232.thumb.jpg.86b2cef3991a8a5ca1d5266abf86115d.jpg

 

IMG_6217.jpg

IMG_6218.jpg

IMG_6219.jpg

IMG_6220.jpg

IMG_6226.jpg

IMG_6227.jpg

IMG_6228.jpg

IMG_6229.jpg

IMG_6231.jpg

IMG_6234.jpg

IMG_6235.jpg

18thcenturylabel.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a 19th c Mittenwalder to me.

You might be able to find the present holder of the Hill Archives and see if, for a fee i am sure, obtain what instrument in the Hill Archives is linked to that number. It might tall you nothing, it might help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem to have a talent for photographing so, that all the bits I want to look at are in a shaddow!

 

One should remember, with Mathias Thir, that it was a fairly large workshop, and that he supplied violins for 6 Gulden, and others for 12 Gulden and that the quality varies for this reason. Also be carefull with the label, since these are generally hand written to immitate print, as I explained in my recent post about Widhalm. I could well imagine that it comes from the Thier Workshop, although I would need to have the oppotunity to have a closer look. It looks to me as if it needs taking apart to repair all those badly glued cracks. If you do, I hope you post pictures of the inside.

 

Viennese violins are not a competence of the Hills, it would probably be more entertaining to read their opinions on Irish home rule, or something similar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jacobsaunders said:

You seem to have a talent for photographing so, that all the bits I want to look at are in a shaddow!

 

One should remember, with Mathias Thir, that it was a fairly large workshop, and that he supplied violins for 6 Gulden, and others for 12 Gulden and that the quality varies for this reason. Also be carefull with the label, since these are generally hand written to immitate print, as I explained in my recent post about Widhalm. I could well imagine that it comes from the Thier Workshop, although I would need to have the oppotunity to have a closer look. It looks to me as if it needs taking apart to repair all those badly glued cracks. If you do, I hope you post pictures of the inside.

 

Viennese violins are not a competence of the Hills, it would probably be more entertaining to read their opinions on Irish home rule, or something similar

That is hilarious...(re: the Hills).  I really should have someone at least fix up those cracks, and if I ever have the top taken off I will photograph the cr*p out of it.  Until then, is there a particular shadowy bit that I can try and capture?  I was hoping and thinking it was a Thier violin of some sort.  I sure wish you had a shop here in NYC Jacob ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ClefLover said:

Is that an ungrafted neck?  Label appears pre-1850.  Varnish appears Viennese.  I’m sure this is the obvious, so I’ll keep my mouth shut and let Jacob do his thing. :) 

I believe the neck is grafted...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mmmm said:

That is hilarious...(re: the Hills).  I really should have someone at least fix up those cracks, and if I ever have the top taken off I will photograph the cr*p out of it.  Until then, is there a particular shadowy bit that I can try and capture?  I was hoping and thinking it was a Thier violin of some sort.  I sure wish you had a shop here in NYC Jacob ;).

If you live in New York, you should go and visit Bass Clef, and have him let you read his book „Franz Geissenhof und seine Zeit“ which I bullied him into buying. There is a whole chapter on the Thir Family (also in English Translation) and Mathias Thier pictures from page 230 until page 237.

 

The thought of me having a shop in New York makes me shudder and is decidedly science fiction, although a good freind, Julie Reed is there. We sat next to each other for years, first in Munich, then in Bremen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, David Holbrook said:

I'll stay tuned on this one. I would ask mmmm if there is any chance the ribs are let into a groove in the back plate. This would make it French for sure,I think.

I thought they were, there was just a hint of a groove on back corners.

The other clue would be the wood provenance of the belly, of course:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The really give in to separate german/austrian from french would be the construction; inner mould with linings inserted into the blocks versus built on the back (as desribed in another recent thread) with linings cut or glued over them.

In my eyes it looks like a typical south german/austrian, or better "Danubian" instrument from the early 19th century, which could be a Mittenwald "Verleger" as well as a Vienna/Thir workshop or something else; all not far away from each other stylistically. I would trust Jacob how to separate it. The varnish isn't particular "Viennese", but was used widely during this period, nearly all over Europe, even in Schönbach. I thought that this was clarified long ago.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience even sloppy made Mittenwald rib joints, becoming partially unglued (and there seems to be a crack in the rib), can look this way; but usually we are expecting things to be what we are used to see, I'm supposing. I would wait what the OP can tell us about the inside work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Blank face said:

In my experience even sloppy made Mittenwald rib joints, becoming partially unglued (and there seems to be a crack in the rib), can look this way; but usually we are expecting things to be what we are used to see, I'm supposing. I would wait what the OP can tell us about the inside work.

I was talking about the ribs inserted in the back!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Ratcliffiddles said:

I was talking about the ribs inserted in the back!

Now I got it - the small rectangular grooves, partially filled. That would be quite unusual with Mittenwald or Vienna. But did they still make it this way in the assumed period (1800 +x)? And what about it being british?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...