ClefLover Posted February 26, 2018 Report Posted February 26, 2018 Here is another violin... is this actually considered double purfling? Like the strange-bodied violin I posted, I have no clue. The saddle sits on top and the bottom rib is two piece, so I can at least rule out Mittenwald. The ffs are super wide, but really symmetrical, I think... do I smell another factory fiddle?
Rue Posted February 26, 2018 Report Posted February 26, 2018 ...my eyes must be failing...I see nothing...
ClefLover Posted February 26, 2018 Author Report Posted February 26, 2018 Whoops, here are the photos sent to me. And guess the ffs are not as symmetrical as I thought.
ClefLover Posted February 26, 2018 Author Report Posted February 26, 2018 I can also deduct that it needs a bath.
Rue Posted February 26, 2018 Report Posted February 26, 2018 Yes...that is double purfling and there is the extra turn to the scroll. The extra turn is not actually a "real Maggini" feature...it materialised in copies due to a mis-reading... I think it is attractive. Hope it plays well. Post more pics after the bath!
Jeff Jetson Posted February 26, 2018 Report Posted February 26, 2018 I hope it sounds as good as it looks.
deans Posted February 26, 2018 Report Posted February 26, 2018 I would say German/Czech. Among the nicer ones of this type. And it looks to be in very good condition.
ClefLover Posted February 27, 2018 Author Report Posted February 27, 2018 So with a bit of poking around, it seems this extra turn in the scroll was common in “Maggini” German copies around 1900-1920, but Maggini never actually did an extra turn. The double purfling was a Maggini trait. Label is a Scarampella, but why a copy of his work so soon afterward? Plus, it looks nothing like any of his works... if I was a German workshop, why not slap a Maggini label in there to at least have the traits correct? FYI, my research is limited to what I can find on online archives. :/
ClefLover Posted February 27, 2018 Author Report Posted February 27, 2018 Oh, and I basically just stated some info Rue already mentioned, sorry about that broken record.
Rue Posted February 27, 2018 Report Posted February 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, ClefLover said: Oh, and I basically just stated some info Rue already mentioned, sorry about that broken record.
germain Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 Saxony-- they were out of Maggini labels at the moment and found a few Scarampella at the bottom of the drawer... ;-)
hendrik Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 Looks like a " Maggini" copy from the MKN area to me. These are quite common and sometimes sound decent. The violin is oversize at a LOB of 36.3 cm so the value is a fair bit lower than a standard size violin.
J-G Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 Then there's the many da Salo models, with a half turn less in the scroll. I much prefer it to the Maggini scrolls-- but wonder if it has any more historical validity. With these too you get the double purfling, but standard body size.
ClefLover Posted February 28, 2018 Author Report Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, hendrik said: Looks like a " Maggini" copy from the MKN area to me. These are quite common and sometimes sound decent. The violin is oversize at a LOB of 36.3 cm so the value is a fair bit lower than a standard size violin. Very helpful, thank you!
ClefLover Posted February 28, 2018 Author Report Posted February 28, 2018 Would I be crazy to spend $2,200 usd on this violin?
uguntde Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 $2200 sounds OK after it had been set up with a new bridge and strings. This is an attractive instrument.
deans Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 4 minutes ago, ClefLover said: Would I be crazy to spend $2,200 usd on this violin? I could see this particular example sitting in certain shops at that amount, in spite of its origins and size just because its a nice example. It would be a desirable item among fiddlers. It needs a good cleaning and set-up, probably seam gluing, new strings, spacing at the nut is narrow, so figure another $500 or more too.
ClefLover Posted February 28, 2018 Author Report Posted February 28, 2018 52 minutes ago, deans said: I could see this particular example sitting in certain shops at that amount, in spite of its origins and size just because its a nice example. It would be a desirable item among fiddlers. It needs a good cleaning and set-up, probably seam gluing, new strings, spacing at the nut is narrow, so figure another $500 or more too. Okay, gives me something to think on then.
GeorgeH Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 Just a note - Maggini violin copies with double purfling and other non-traditional stylings are not as salable as traditional violins. I learned this when I had two lovely violins by the same maker appraised for replacement cost, and the Maggini model was valued at about 2/3 of the Strad model. Both were of excellent quality. The appraiser told me that classical musicians tend not to buy ornate violins, and fiddle players, who like them more, don't spend as much money on violins as classical players. Something to keep in mind if you're negotiating a price...
puckfandan Posted February 28, 2018 Report Posted February 28, 2018 Old violin set, Italian SCARAMPELLA 1890, as-found https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F162923215292
______ Posted March 1, 2018 Report Posted March 1, 2018 I've seen similiar copy at present Amati Affordable auction, whereas there price starts from 10pounds. Maybe it's worth looking. JM
Blank face Posted March 1, 2018 Report Posted March 1, 2018 12 hours ago, puckfandan said: Old violin set, Italian SCARAMPELLA 1890, as-found https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F162923215292 As the Scarampella label looks quite new (nicely coffee drops applied) the questions if some Markneukirchen wholesalers put it in or if it was bought "long ago in France" appear to be superfluous.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now