Sign in to follow this  
jacobcello11

Cello identification - year 1799?

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


 


I am currently looking to purchase a new cello. I'd like to gather some opinions on the instrument (can someone let me know how to upload photos?) and its authenticity. 


I am a player myself and know relatively little about makers and origins.


It has rather large F-holes and a beautiful one-piece back (maple). The label reads:


 


"Joannes Valletianus fecit Matrito anno 1799". 


 


Has anyone heard of this maker or seen and of his work? 


The varnish is mainly orange with hints of deeper red. The varnish on back is slightly harder and shinier. The back length is 752 mm. 


It has a fantastic sound (very rich and deep bass. Recently performed it alongside a G.B. Gabrielli instrument - the sound qualities were similar). 


 


I will post photos as soon as I understand how. 


 


Thanks a lot!


 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to photos! :)

 

Since you don't have enough posts yet to load photo from your computer directly to MN...I'd suggest you upload them to a hosting site such as Photobucket...and then link from there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that's thought to be a latinized label used by Giovanni Maria Valenzano, correct?  Someone correct me if I'm mistaken. 

 

If I'm correct, I've seen a good number of violins and one very nice 'cello by the maker.

 

If I assume these are being represented as authentic (the Gabrielli and this 'cello), you're looking at 6 figure 'cellos, correct?  I take it you're working with qualified professionals (dealers, appraisers, and restorers)?  They should be able to provide you with any existing expertise concerning the instrument.  If they are unable, you should seek out some independent assistance (private, not internet)... and you may want to do that in any case.

 

If the instruments are for sale (especially privately or through a dealer), I'd be a little reluctant to comment on photos of them in an open, public access, forum...  You may want to reconsider exposing them in that manner as well.  They are not your property.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies. 

Jeffrey, I appreciate your concern and should have been more clear about my intentions with the post. The cello is being sold by a university conservatory that has owned it for the past several decades. It has no certifications and the school acquired it as a gift. I am in contact with the Director of the conservatory – he has asked that I try to gather some opinions on the cello before they consider selling it (I enquired about the sale of the cello after playing it). The institute is aware that I am sending photos to external parties. 

I have already taken the cello to several shops in my area. It has had some substantial repairs (sound post cracks in front and back, bass bar crack) and there is speculation as to its origins. I've linked some photos below... Thanks again! 

 

http://s1382.photobucket.com/user/jacobcello11/library/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow.  I am quite interested to hear more about it too!  Nice scroll.  Lovely flaming...

 

The rest I won't even hazard a guess at...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd also say german production. The color of the wood of the scroll where the varnish is thin is slightly greenish This makes me suspect it was treated with some acid, doesn't nitric acid turn the wood greyish green? I wouldn't be surprised of at least the flame on the scroll is caused by treatment with something like that. If you look at the left/treble side of the scroll, I think I see that the treatment didn't succeed uniformly well. The purfling is set in rather far from the edge in a way that I feel s similar to a cello a student of mine plays, the varnish is not unsimilar in appearance either (the appearance on the yellower pictures). It doesn't look like a bad cello, but to me it doesn't look like a fantastoc one either. The one piece back is quite attractive!

 

I'm only a player and not a connoiseur at all. I hope to get the discussion started.

 

What could help is a picture of a corner of the ribs, to establish how the ribs were constructed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.