j15310 Posted December 27, 2013 Report Share Posted December 27, 2013 Hi all! Could you please id my violin? I have been playing it for more than 20 years and still do not know, what it really is. There is a label inside, that reads: “Nicolas rue Croix des petits Champs a Paris 1805”. Here is the link to some pictures on photobucket: http://s847.photobucket.com/user/ichdd1/library/ Thanks a lot for your input! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertdo Posted December 27, 2013 Report Share Posted December 27, 2013 I suppose it's a copy of a Nicolas Lupot violin, although I have just read that N. Lupot founded the school at this address only in 1806. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j15310 Posted December 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2013 Hi, Thanks to robertdo. Another bits of information concerning the label of this puzzling violin: The label seems to be (a reproduction of ?) Nicolas's: I do not remember where I read this (Luetgendorff perhaps), but there is actually a maker named Nicolas who used labels in that style and wording. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertdo Posted December 28, 2013 Report Share Posted December 28, 2013 there is also a Francois fourier Nicolas (from a family of luthiers) who was a french luthier for the royal school. He was born in Mirecourt in 1758 and died in Paris in 1816. He was a Luthier at the "rue Croix des Petits Champs around 1800. I read that some of his violins had the inscription "Nicolas a Paris" burnt on the lower bout rib near the button on the bass side. In any case it's a very nice looking violin, with flowing curves, and although I am no expert it seems as old as many other violins shown here. 200 years is not that old all else considered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j15310 Posted December 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2013 Hi, there is no such brand on the lower bout In addition to that the year on the label does not seem to be handwritten (see below). So I do not have much trust in this label. I have taken some measurements of the violin: Body Length (back): 359 mmString Length: 330 mmDiapason: 197 mmNeck: 133 mmUpper Bouts: 165 mmCenter Bouts: 114 mmLower Bouts: 207 mm I figured out how to include some pictures here directly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j15310 Posted January 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2014 Still no ideas? We need to ship this violin; my brother who owns and plays this fiddle lives abroad and always has to much luggage to take the violin case with him on the plane. (j15310 is actually two persons, me and my brother, the first posts being written at the Christmas-time family get-together.) The worst case we can think of is that the violin gets lost or damaged; even if it were insured we would not be able to make a claim for an unknown violin of unknown origin and value.But we have absolutely no idea whether the value warrants instrument or shipping insurance or not. If it is only worth a few hundered EUR it probably does not. So that is why the sudden interest in the origin and value of this fiddle. Some time ago, when I had a bow rehaired I tried to sneak in some questions about the violin; the only thing the local luthier said was that he does not think the violin is as old as the label says, and that it could be French. we forgot to post the pis of the label: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richf Posted January 2, 2014 Report Share Posted January 2, 2014 That is the label for Francois-Fourrier Nicolas (1758-1816), as presented in Henri Poidras' "Dictionary of Violin Makers, Old and Modern" (Volume 1). Poidras says "Although not of the first order, his work has genuine qualities........specimens of it are scarce." Althought the label looks right, that is not to say that it belongs in this violin. Hope it does! Richard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j15310 Posted January 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 Many thanks to Richard and robertdo for your input! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin swan Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 I'm a bit baffled by this violin - I think that's mainly because the varnish has been heavily modified, and I'm not sure the pins are original. We can see remains of a darker brown varnish on the scroll, around the f-holes and part of the ribs - was this the original varnish? I'm not sure that the scroll graft is genuine either - the grain in the maple looks rather continuous, though it's hard to tell in the photo of the side of the scroll. On the other hand, the label looks rather good - but did it come out of another violin? Given the date, clearing up whether the graft is real or not would be very illuminating. If it's fake, I think we can discount Fourrier-Nicolas. But I want it to be genuine, and think it most likely is ..... In which case just wait until you can take it in hand baggage! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j15310 Posted January 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2014 Hi, thanks for your reply! I took a closer look at the graft and it does not look genuine to me(?). On the treble side of the neck there is much wear. (Perhaps a previous owner wore a ring on the index finger?) Any other ideas what else the violin could be ? Is it French? I dont know if the photobucket gallery works for you; there are some more pictures: http://s847.photobuc...ichdd1/library/ The best pics of the graft are already here: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwold Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 I'm no expert, but that sure looks like a fake graft to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertdo Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 Yes, I don't think one needs to be an expert to see that this is no real graft (on the first picture all the lines of the wood going down show no difference on the part below the "graft") and if you look inside the peg holes there is no cutting lines like one should see in case of a graft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j15310 Posted January 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2014 In case anyone is interested: I have new information about the label. I sent an e-mail to Roland Terrier and he really was a great help, so much thanks goes to him. That is what he had to say about the label: " [...] l’étiquette ne peut être originale, car François Fourier de Paris n’était pas à cette adresse en 1805, mais rue Nicaise!. C’est la reproduction d’une étiquette qui sort de plusieurs ouvrages, mais de 1807 Jusqu’à son décès supposé, il est répertorié par les annuaires rue d’Argenteuil, et je pense que même cette étiquette connue de 1812 est un faux ! " (Cited with kind permission of the author) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.