Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Old Italian Texts


CarloBartolini

Recommended Posts

I am always running into some old italian texts related to violin. I wish I had the time to translate them, but I thought I'd post them in this thread as I find them. Hopefully others may too.

 

Elementi teorico-pratici di Musica con un saggio sopra l'Arte di suonare il violino - 1791

 

Ttechnical aspects begins on page 63.

 

Have Fun. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am always running into some old italian texts related to violin. I wish I had the time to translate them, but I thought I'd post them in this thread as I find them. Hopefully others may too.

 

Elementi teorico-pratici di Musica con un saggio sopra l'Arte di suonare il violino - 1791

 

Setup and technical aspects begins on page 63.

 

Have Fun. :)

Grazie Carlo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can hardly resist a smell of the old books so I immediately went through this one, in spite not knowing Italian, and I found this interesting detail:

 

On p. 81 Galeazzi is counting his favorite violin makers: “Steiner, Swizzero, Castagnery, Chapuy, Francesi, Nicolo, Andrea ed Antonio Amati, Antonio Stradivari, Guarnerio, e Ruggeri, tutti Cremonesi….Mattia Albano, Giacomo Horil, David Tekler, Tedeschi, Nicolo Galliani, Napoletano….

He particularly emphasized Giuseppe Odoardi whose violins were in that time, according to G., considered equal with those from Cremona.      

 

Intriguing thing is that Galeazzi (b.1758 – d. 1819) wrote about Odoardi that he lived only 28 years and made about 200 violins. Nowadays we know that, according to one authority he was working until 1675 in Ascoli, and according to another, was born about 1740, but generally accepted years are b. 1746 – d. c.1786, so he lived more or less 40 years (see Cozio or Amati data). Furthermore, in Cozio archives there are 34 violins (majority of them are certified) dated from 1770 to 1792.

So it is to conclude that Galeazzi failed when asserted Odoardi lived only 28 years. This is not strange at all, since it is very well known about uncertainness of old sources. But, on the other hand – if our nowadays knowledge is right, Odoardi and Galeazzi lived in the same time, so Galeazzi probably had to know what he was writing about. I can't stop asking myself what is the heck here, perhaps another, now Odoardi’s code???      

 

Sorry Carlo but I couldn't help myself not to mention 'code' :)  …with all my respect; the book is great, thanks for sharing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

This is interesting for a novice like me....maybe some more informed member can comment. - the name "la violetta".

 

edit - .. if there is connection from the ribecca with the violin, il violino, la violina, la violetta?

Il dittionario di Ambrogio Calepino dalla lingua latina nella volgare brevemente ridotto. Per lo signor Lucio Minerbi.. -1553

post-41255-0-18677600-1375185268_thumb.jpg

Edited by carlobartolini
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the blurb on Rocca on page 31or 32 of the 1861 exhibit, it seems to translate that G. Rocca is being quoted.  If so, that's quite a find for such an iconic maker.  If someone who speaks Italian would check that out and let us know what he's saying, I'd appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Joe, nice of you.

 

In the blurb on Rocca on page 31or 32 of the 1861 exhibit, it seems to translate that G. Rocca is being quoted.  If so, that's quite a find for such an iconic maker.  If someone who speaks Italian would check that out and let us know what he's saying, I'd appreciate it.

 

Please excuse the "traduttore traditore" [traitor translator] ....me... :unsure: ..and the spelling/grammar mistakes which naturally occur in my writing.. :rolleyes: (feel free to correct me...please)

 

It appears the jury was not in a great mood....maybe a cold front had just hit Florence and they where all feisty. :D

 

§ II
String Instruments.

 

Ad Arco ed a pizzico

 

The exposition of these instruments, ancient glory of Italy, as a set it is not too comforting ;  what's more in midst of many mediocre labors are noted some honorable exceptions.

 

1. Guadagnini Antonio, of Turin ….

 

2. Chiocchi Gaetano, of Padova ….

 

3. Rocca Giuseppe, of Turin, exposed three violins  of the price of 150 lire each, one viola of the same price, and one arpichitarra [harp-guitar] of the price of 200 lire.

 

The violins are not all of the same quality ; but in general the instruments exposed by this maker have good quality of sound, and reciprocate well. The labor appears at times somewhat ordinary, and the varnish disunite. So much that it appears as if they are still not completely finished.

 

The harp-guitar is a ordinary six string guitar, to which laterally  are added another seven to be played a vuoto [in vacuum - meaning freely]  to reinforce the bass. The Rocca says this instrument is  his invention, it may be so in any particularity of the construction, but the idea of adding to the instrument some strings to be played a vuoto  remounts back to the time of the arci-liuti [arch-lutes] ;  afterwards almost everyone has heard the famous Legnani playing a guitar assembled according to this same system.

 

In spite of the mends above indicated, in view of the musical value of the instruments ad arco by this exhibitor, the section (jury) would be of the opinion that it should be obliged to concede the laureate of the medal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Carlo, for the topic and for the above translation.

 

I had missed that the quoting of Rocca was about his "harp-guitar."  That makes what followed a little less interesting, but still interesting in that the writer quoted him at all, and that he made instruments outside the violin family.  I never saw anything in my limited literature that Rocca did so.

 

Also interesting that his regular instruments seemed, to the judges, unfinished.  According to Henley Rocca did go through a period  of upheaval resulting from "certain irregular habits" which perhaps was setting in about the time of this exposition.  He would not be the first or last maker to get to an exposition or competition with instruments not quite perfectly finished. :)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really that old, but...

 

 

Alfonso Mandelli, 1903

 

This is the book that the Hills lifted, er, borrowed many of the engravings from, for their Strad book.

The difference between plagiarism and scholarship is a bibliography and a good set of footnotes :D

 

Thanks for the link :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandelli was a lawyer, journalist, and playwright.  He was the author of more than 6 books.

 

Hill’s book says:

 

 

 

PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION.
The idea of writing this book is in some measure due to the intelligent initiative of Signor Mandelli, of Cremona, to whom, as well as to our friends and subscribers, we owe some words of explanation and apology. Full of the desire to obtain fresh information concerning Antonio Stradivari, Signor Mandelli determined to make further researches in the archives of his native city, and thus add to the world's knowledge; and, his material collected, he approached us in the year 1890 with a view to its publication in English and Italian.

 

 

Mandelli’s name appears 22 times in Hill’s book, exclusive of the index.

 

I recall reading that the illustrations of Cremona came from Mandelli.  I can’t find that reference at the moment.  So I will retract my lighthearted, offhand comment.   :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, there is a fairly large bibliography here:

 

Archivo della Liuteria Cremonese

 

The site also contains lists of historical documents pertaining to, and instruments made by, Cremona luthiers.

 

For example, for Nicolo Amati, it lists:

 

 

 

di Amati Nicolò
DOCUMENTI
Trovati 16 elementi.
1596 - Battesimo di Nicolò
1645 - Matrimonio di Nicolò Amati con Lucrezia Pagliari
1646 - Battesimo di Girolamo Francesco Amati
1647 - Battesimo di Teresa Francesca Amati
1648 - Sepoltura di Girolamo Francesco Amati
1649 - Battesimo di Girolamo II Amati
1650 - Battesimo di Teresa Amati
1653 - Battesimo di Gian Battista Amati
1654 - Sepoltura di Gian Battista Amati
1655 - Battesimo di Anna Maria Amati
1657 - Battesimo di Giovanni Battista
1659 - Battesimo di Giuseppe Amati
1661 - Battesimo di Eufrasia Scolastica Amati
1684 - Sepoltura di Nicolò Amati
1703 - Morte e sepoltura di Lucrezia Pagliari
1718 - Morte e sepoltura di don Giovanni Battista Amati

 

 

... and a list of 242 instruments!  This includes small B&W photos, date, provenance, and bibliographic references.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

 

BTW, there is a fairly large bibliography here:

 

Archivo della Liuteria Cremonese

 

The site also contains lists of historical documents pertaining to, and instruments made by, Cremona luthiers.

 

Thanks, Addie. I enjoyed exploring this site, even though I picked up this thread fairly late.

A lot of data packed in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...