confusedone Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 I am new to this whole thing looking to buy my first violin. I have read a lot on this topic and realize that getting a better violin now will probably be more beneficial at least as far as staying enthusiastic. I have found a violin, but unfortunately do not know enough about them (I do not want to trust the seller completely). Seller says it is labelled Johannes Pressenda of Turin, but most likely it is a tribute piece styled alike. He also says it is a 1850 Czech violin. Any feedback at all would be helpful and much appreciated. http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l582/pahdah_hound/Czech%201870%20Lury%201-19-2013/Czech14.jpg http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l582/pahdah_hound/Czech%201870%20Lury%201-19-2013/Czech1.jpg http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l582/pahdah_hound/Czech%201870%20Lury%201-19-2013/Czech2.jpg http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l582/pahdah_hound/Czech%201870%20Lury%201-19-2013/Czech8.jpg http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l582/pahdah_hound/Czech%201870%20Lury%201-19-2013/Czech9.jpg http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l582/pahdah_hound/Czech%201870%20Lury%201-19-2013/Czech13.jpg Posting the photos in Link form because they are very large and I know you guys hate that.
CCM Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 Here's an eBay link to Jesse's violin; http://www.ebay.com/itm/Gorgeous-Old-Antique-19th-Century-Czech-Bohemian-Violin-No-Reserve-/330872678207?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d098c673f I trust the seller of this violin and he has a loyal following. His description is truthful and accurate. He does indeed indicate that the violin has a false label. For that matter, a label should not be relied on in order to determine who made a particular fiddle. If you want a valuation and appraisal, I suggest you pay for one after purchase.
jacobsaunders Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 The “Vendor” writes: This violin bears the spuriouslabelof Johannes Pressenda of Turin. The violin is not by Pressenda, in myopinion, but probably was made around thesame period. It is possible thatthe maker intended to copy some of thewell-known attributes of authentic Pressenda violins like thehighly flamed one piece back, the Stradivarian outline withcharacteristic deep scoop at the edges, the robust look of aGuarneri without the excess, and broadand flat arching across the lower bout risinggradually to a moderate arch at the waist. Even the brightredtints to the varnish are similar toPressenda's. Rather than a fake, I believe this violin wasanadmirable tribute to the violins that have made Pressenda the most highlyregarded violin maker of the 19thcentury. This is abject nonesense. It is infact a standard bottom end product ofthe Schönbach (Bohemia) cottage industry from the end of the 19th C., whichsomeone appears to have additionaly “aged” with a screwdriver (see scratches onthe belly) and inserted a fake label long after it was made. The artisan/s whomade this instrument will have had no idea who on earth Pressenda was, andworked several generations later than he did. Also the neck graft appears to beon the point of breaking off, as one can see well in the two proile views ofthe scroll. In short, It would be simple to appraise the instrument, since it isworth exactly nothing. If you wish to buy a violin, you would be far far better advised to go toyour local luthier, who will be able to advise you (free ofcharge!)
Jeff White Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 I'll second Jacob on this. While Jessie (pahdahound)has a good return policy, that open seam looks real bad. Nothing good will come of that, for sure. Might be holding now, but.....................jeff
puckfandan Posted February 14, 2013 Report Posted February 14, 2013 Jeff, which pic are you looking at? just want to see what I am missing, vision is not what it used to be
confusedone Posted February 23, 2013 Author Report Posted February 23, 2013 Thank you guys, I now realize that purchase would have been a mistake. The violin later sold for about $1500 (well outside of my budget anyway).
Jeff White Posted February 24, 2013 Report Posted February 24, 2013 Jeff, which pic are you looking at? just want to see what I am missing, vision is not what it used to be Dan, my bad. I shouldn't have used the word "seam" as I knew what I meant, but that wasn't the best term. I am talking about the mess just between the nut and the chin, by the neck graft. I am using the pics from the ebay auction. I can't believe that violin went for that much. jeff
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now