Ken Pollard Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 http://www.stuff.co.nz/2549401/The-instrum...-force-a-violin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim McTigue Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 I thought that was going to be about the law in England banning the practicing of violins at home. There is indeed a lot of sentiment these days about violins in the home, and in fact domestic violins have been called one of the biggest crime problems of our time. Nearly every city has a domestic violins hotline these days... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronos Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 I thought that was going to be about the law in England banning the practicing of violins at home. Seriously? References, please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim McTigue Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 Might not have been an actual law, but perhaps one of those public nuisance things (there was a recent case of a woman who was jailed because she was under one of those orders, and made too much noise during lovemaking in her own home). Anyway, I'm sure I read about it within the past couple of years, where folks weren't allowed to practice violin in their own home. However, the rest of the puns about "domestic violins" were meant firmly tongue-in-cheek... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Fenestrate Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 Oh dear, I expected banjos to be outlawed long before violins Might not have been an actual law, but perhaps one of those public nuisance things (there was a recent case of a woman who was jailed because she was under one of those orders, and made too much noise during lovemaking in her own home). Anyway, I'm sure I read about it within the past couple of years, where folks weren't allowed to practice violin in their own home. However, the rest of the puns about "domestic violins" were meant firmly tongue-in-cheek... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Tucker Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 Oh dear, I expected banjos to be outlawed long before violins And what about violas? Come on, let's at least put the blame where the blame is due. Then too, there are the viola players - without the players, ther'd be no violas. Ban the lot of 'em, I say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stradofear Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 Sax and violins: the scourge of the morals of our era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonnichs Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 I don't have time to check but I recall that in his book "The Romance of the Fiddle" van der Straeten makes reference to the banning in London of the "Playing of ye Fyddles" in "Publick Places". This was in the early 18th century. At that time the "fyddle" was an instrument carried by itinerants to the local pubs, where dancing and drinking ensued, usually followed by fits of brawling. People just had a lot more fun in those days. The violin was held in the same low regard as electric guitars sometimes were here in the US during the 50's and 60's. The gentlefolk of that time played only the Gamba. Time was to wait for the Italians such as Tartini to raise the regard of the violin to a more revered status. Regarding the incident cited in this post-if handguns and violins were all "registered" these types of things wouldn't happen. I wonder if the players in this crime were "all strung out?" Fritz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnmasters Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 And what about violas?Come on, let's at least put the blame where the blame is due. Then too, there are the viola players - without the players, ther'd be no violas. Ban the lot of 'em, I say. It should not be against the law to own a viola, but it should be a felony to play one in public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robedney Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 Well, if you read the actual news story (linked) you'll note that it has to do with the use of a violin as a weapon. This, in my view, is a compelling argument for having at least one carbon-fiber instrument. Much more effective in close combat situations. Robert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimRobinson Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 It should not be against the law to own a viola, but it should be a felony to play one in public. Which reminds me of the definition of a gentleman - one who knows how to play the piano accordian, but chooses not to. Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimRobinson Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 I don't have time to check but I recall that in his book "The Romance of the Fiddle" van der Straeten makes reference to the banning in London of the "Playing of ye Fyddles" in "Publick Places". This was in the early 18th century. At that time the "fyddle" was an instrument carried by itinerants to the local pubs, where dancing and drinking ensued, usually followed by fits of brawling. People just had a lot more fun in those days. Is that a pochette in your pocket, or.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanW Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Of course there's always those that take the law into their own hands. Check this chilling story from Australia's deep north.... Man snaps after three years of bad violin playing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim McTigue Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Of course there's always those that take the law into their own hands. Oh, Rochester... Rochester... Now, cut that out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Pollard Posted June 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Oh, Rochester... Rochester... Now, cut that out! I seem to remember that once Jack Benny was asked if his violin was a real Stradivarius. He replied: if it's not, I've been cheated out of $12.95. Or something to that extent. I did an unsuccessful search to find the quote, but found these two instead. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/makeemlaugh/episod...-his-violin/16/ http://www.tv.com/the-jack-benny-program/t...39/summary.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetmusicstudio Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 LOL :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.