sonnichs Posted December 9, 2008 Report Share Posted December 9, 2008 I generally follow the fingerboard arching when making violin bridges, sometimes adjusting the D and A a bit for the player. I use 36mm for the 1/2 violins and 39mm for the 3/4 ones. I do some work for a teacher that prefers a bit more arch for her 1/2 size violins, this making it easier for the young players to master the bowing on a single string. I was curious if others have encountered such requests? I don't have a problem with this, but I would be curious if there is a MENC standard or some other recommendations by the teaching community for modified arching. Cheers, Fritz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Maurice Posted December 9, 2008 Report Share Posted December 9, 2008 I use standard bridge templates for most of my bridge cutting. I do however get requests from teachers to provide a bit more arching for beginners so that they have less problem with contact with two instead of one string. However, if the arching gets too high then it can lead to excessive arm movement when crossing strings. I find that as the students advance they have better bow control and can handle the standard bridge cut. Terry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPherson Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 I agree with Terry, unfortunately (or fortunately depending on how you look at it) out of the 20 or so teachers i deal with 2/3ds of them have a preference on the bridge arch. Not a problem with me doing it my problem is remembering which teacher wants what arching!!! Jesse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Posted December 11, 2008 Report Share Posted December 11, 2008 It's not the arching (in other words, string clearance on the bridge radius) which is the potential problem - normal standard arching templates for the various instrument sizes provide adequate string clearance. However, when the fingerboard has a weird radius or a weird lateral slant, or the fingerboard projection is haywire, bowing problems can occur. Also, the depth of the notches on the bridge should be in relation to the thickness of the strings. A very thick C-string on a cello next to a thin G can render a standard bridge radius meaningless and ineffective if the thickness of the strings are not provided for in the depth of the notches. It is therefore essential to actually measure alternate string clearances (for instance, on a cello, the clearance of the G string above the C/D strings, and the D above the G/A) when cutting the notches, just like you measure the string distance above the fingerboard for the outer strings. These are specific and easily-manipulated parameters to implement when finishing the bridge top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.