allegro Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Hi All Just a quick one - I have heard, over and over, by may teachers, INTONATION is everything. Now, I have seen some students with fantastic intonation but no musicality, no grace in performance etc. and I did not enjoy the performance. Yet, some without perfect intonation, I enjoy. What is your opinion? Cheers, Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omobono Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Michael, While we might know what you mean, it's an impossible question to answer, which you probably realise anyhow. Musicality naturally includes sound intonation, but sheer intonation cannot stand alone and it cannot be everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldgeezer Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Of course intonation isn't everything but it's basic to playing strings. Depending on the playing level you may be more or less tolerant of an occasional lapse in intonation. As the skill level rises you expect fewer problems with intonation. String students like all students will develop their skills at different rates so some may still be having problems with intonation even though their other skills are more advanced. You'll hear an occasional sour note in live performances that would be edited out of recordings demonstrating that intonation is a never ending struggle for string players and singers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noahmyviolin Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Intonation is important, but so is technique. I guess it depends on what kind of classical music you are talking about. Baroque, Romantic, Bach, Rach, sarabande, prelude? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4strings Posted April 14, 2007 Report Share Posted April 14, 2007 Yesterday I had the distinct privilege of being a judge at a high school solo and ensemble festival, and worked with small ensembles. Bless their hearts, some were great and some were very unprepared. But my favorite performance of the day, one I will remember for a long time, was a bass and violin duet of a little Dancla polka-like piece. The violinist's technique was absolutely awful, but he somehow managed to play well enough in tune that I could tell what the true pitches were supposed to be, and he and she (the bassist) both obviously loved what they were playing. It was great stuff, and they made my day. I think (and told them) that with the joy they have in what they're doing, it seems to me that they have all the inspiration and kick they need to get to the next level; to make changes, one by one, that will allow them to develop what they want out of music. Bless the teacher who found them that piece, and who encouraged them to enjoy it with the technique they had, rather than belaboring them with technical issues as I (perfectionist of Nordic origins) most likely would have done. This was an eye-opener to me; I'll be thinking about the implications for some time now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DutchViolins Posted April 14, 2007 Report Share Posted April 14, 2007 Michael, You said that you enjoyed some performances without perfect intonation. What is in this word some? Does it mean some do some don't? Why is that? From my experience there is no perfect intonation. Each performer will create its own intonation. For the audience this may result in different perceptions: some like it some don't. Concerning your remark about grace in performance: do you prefer to see how good the player is or do you want to hear how good s/he is? Suggestive movements are very misleading. I personally don't like a too excessive body movement. They finally bother me and prevent me from enjoying the music played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allegro Posted April 16, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2007 quote: Originally posted by: DutchViolins You said that you enjoyed some performances without perfect intonation. What is in this word some? Does it mean some do some don't? Why is that? The main reason is the musicality, expression and "passion". Some players are so technically perfect that they are not fun to watch. Interpretation of a piece is also important to me. quote: Originally posted by: DutchViolins Concerning your remark about grace in performance: do you prefer to see how good the player is or do you want to hear how good s/he is? Suggestive movements are very misleading. I personally don't like a too excessive body movement. They finally bother me and prevent me from enjoying the music played. Some players are both a joy to listen and to watch - my examples Vadim Repin, Vivianne Hagner, Vadim Gluzman. Yes - I do not like excessive body movement. Not going to name them here but there are quite a few big names who I prefer to listen to and not watch. Cheers, Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EarlyRetiree Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Allegro --- my opinion is that there isn't a clear-cut answer and that it depends largely on the type of music being played. I love classical music and I expect the intonation to be perfect and the piece to be performed with passion and musicality. But I also love "Old-Timey" fiddle. If you get a recording by Tommy Jarrell or many other old-timers, you'll enjoy the often 'close but not quite' intonation in both the playing and the singing. There's a weird charismatic quality to his playing that just seems to fit that style of music. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.