Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

REFERENCE: Terminology, Illustrations, Diagrams


Guy_Gallo

Recommended Posts

quote:


Originally posted by:
fiddlecollector

Heres a different variation,the button is a dummy it doesnt turn.

>That

quote:


Originally posted by:
falstaff

Found this image on

early_17th_froglarge.jpg


And this is a clip-in frog, but with the rarer semicircular 'notch' at the front of the frog instead of a triangular projection--either of which serve to 'center' the frog as it is clipped in place.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fiddlecollector, if you mean the clip-in frog, they are not normally adjustable--although some few makers are now making them with a sort of 'ratchet' under the frog.

They were originally adjusted for tension by putting strips of paper under the hair.

By the way, I think we ought to be careful about just posting other people's photos by linking directly to their server, it's often not appreciated when the owner's bandwidth spikes because someone copped their photo link, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no need of a peg under the frog with a crémaillère frog, the frog slides along, commonly kept parallel by having a groove in it which fits the stick like a modern bow, and the ratchet allows a wide range of adjustment. I believe in some cases the frog may slide in a groove on the bottom of the stick, but take that with a grain of salt as I may be making it up.

By the way, it begins to appear that the screw mechanism appeared rather later than is commonly thought. Many transitional bows still had clip-in type frogs, and it is quite likely that no baroque bows originally had screw frogs at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:


Originally posted by:
Andres Sender

By the way, I think we ought to be careful about just posting other people's photos by linking directly to their server, it's often not appreciated when the owner's bandwidth spikes because someone copped their photo link, right?

Good point. I figured the inclusion of a direct link to the whole site (and any additional traffic to the site) would justify the use of the image in this thread.

But there is no reason to not host the photo (and so conserve the original's bandwidth).

I've edited my original message and linked to a different server. I will PM you the address and you can edit your message that contains the image...

Thanks.

Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the initial post of the clip on frog I linked my message directly to the image as it was stored on the Historical Bows website rather than saving it to MY server (PhotoBucket). Andres pointed out, correctly, that some websites have a specified amount of bandwidth, and my linking from here would, in effect, count against that website's total allotment. I've since moved the photo to PhotoBucket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FC, there used to be talk that screws came in around 1700. I'd love to see the one dated 1720. There's a great pair of articles on early bows in Early Music magazine of a few years ago by Robert Seletsky. He argues that many bows are dated too early or were retrofitted. It appears that there was a vogue for 'retro' looking bows during the transitional period, probably catering to a conservative segment of the market even while the bow evolved towards the modern design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thought on bandwidth/hosting -- taking the picture to host on your own server can be seen as stealing it (ie publishing it without permission), whereas linking to the photo on their site maintains possession/ownership. Falstaff, if I may paraphrase your comments earlier in this thread (Dec 27) -- they didn't make the photos to post on Maestronet. A link is better etiquette.

Bottom line is that if a picture is taken to be hosted elsewhere, permission should be asked of the original owner. If there are issues of bandwidth, the picture owner may graciously accept your offer of separately hosting the photo.

Just my opinion, of course -- but I suspect it may have some legal validity as well.

--Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things I hope this thread can accomplish is to re-establish such lost links between an image and it's creator. I know I have images that, like yours, I've forgotten where they came from.

I think we should post them here (if appropriate) and ask the other members if they can help track down the sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm reading correctly, the ivory bow which FiddleCollector posted is stamped Vuillaume. Here is another of his experiements, from a recent Da Salo auction.

Vuillaume-103-06sm.jpg

The interesting side note to this post is that a friend of mine has recently played one of these bows and thought it was quite remarkable (and apt to the music of the time of its creation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...