guta Posted August 11, 2005 Report Posted August 11, 2005 This looks rather nice to me. The violin is seemingly in v.g. condition, it looks the age on the label. Question - does the label belong? In the photo it looks possibly O.K., but without a brand or signature in the back it is a problem. There are several stains on the label, something often done to make it look like the label belongs. Reason for concern on this is difference in value. As a generic it's about $3,000, as a well preserved Otto, maybe $6,000. But it will probably go cheap, so maybe it doesn't matter. Personally, I really like a violin with provenance and some historical interest. All Best, Larry.
pabloci Posted August 11, 2005 Report Posted August 11, 2005 I thought the label looked fishy but then again one should never rely on a label. It seems that in EBay, labels carry a lot of weight, they shouldn't. Authentic instruments should be verified in writing by a respected luthier.
Steve R. Posted August 11, 2005 Report Posted August 11, 2005 I notice that the label bears a number, are there references which might help authenticate the violin (and label) based on that?
fiddlecollector Posted August 11, 2005 Report Posted August 11, 2005 Dont know the maker but to me it looks refinished and the wood looks soaked in oil.
zithromax Posted August 12, 2005 Report Posted August 12, 2005 How do you tell if a violin is refinished?
jbgilm Posted August 12, 2005 Report Posted August 12, 2005 I think you should assume that the label is a fake. The seller seems well-informed. If the seller believed the label, he or she would not be selling the violin on ebay, or would do something to prove it was genuine. I'm not suggesting that the seller put a fake label in, by the way. Incidentally, I recently bought a fiddle on ebay that had a fake label. I like it a lot and am totally satisfied. John
Skreechee Posted August 13, 2005 Report Posted August 13, 2005 I think it is hard to tell if it has ben refinished and I don't know how anyone can tell from those pictures - it certainly has had wear to the top varnish but does not present any scratches, dings etc so maybe. It looks linseed oiled. It is well made though. Out of my price range already! LOL!
jackc Posted August 14, 2005 Report Posted August 14, 2005 I agree with Fiddlecollector. The back looks to me as if it was stained with shoepolish. Nice figure in the wood, but it has that discontinuous figure that I've rarely seen in a fine instrument. Just an opinion.
bean_fidhleir Posted August 14, 2005 Report Posted August 14, 2005 French polished, do you think? And I wonder whether that strong figuring on the back and ribs could be from not having had the pores filled with ground first? It looks very dramatic.
Skreechee Posted August 14, 2005 Report Posted August 14, 2005 I just looked again and I think it is french polished actually bean - although you'd have to have a feel - but it looks very flat and that kind of dull shine you get with 1800's furniture, not violin varnish texture. The grain looks muddied and not sharp that I have seen happen with a ground coat of wood dyes instead of the proper way. Still, thats how some makers worked.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now