Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi!

...I wonder if anyone is familiar with that label / french maker, I cannot decipher the label since someone has scraped parts off. The label reads "Lutherie Artistique" and then "G. xxxRNIER" or so.

It's a cute french violin with high arching, around 1900.

label1.jpg

label2.jpg

Thanks,

Anne

Posted

They seem t have been imported into the U.K quite alot around 1900-1920, alot appear in Scotland possibly supplied by some of the bigger trade dealers.

Heres a pic of one. (i know a professional violinist who used one for years as a second violin ,he was handed it down by his father.)

658141031-77.jpg

Posted

Yes they all tend to look very similar,they are better trade violins and ive just remmembered who made them, the Laberte-Magnie (also named later in the 1920`s Fourier or Fournier/Magnie shop) in Mirecourt. Laberte also owned the trade names of Nicolas ,derazey,and others.The firm was run by relatives of Marc Laberte.

Mangenot also produced some instruments with a `J.Fournier ` label.I guess that Fournier was probably an early 19th century maker, whos name was bought by these later workshops as a trademark name.

Posted

hm, I don't think they have so much in common... these two violins look rather different in my eyes. Anyway, thanks!

There is still a lot of work to do on that one. Neck is lose, some open seams, saddle, bridge, soundpost and that.

Anne

Posted

It has some differences ,mainly the colour,the one i posted is the more usual colour of fournier violins ,ive seen around 20 and had 3-4 in the past. Yours is possibly made by one of the associated workshops ,Laberte-Humbert violins are often that colour(mirecourt orange) and strangely high arched, very bloated looking when viewed from the side.

Posted

I had a Breton violin, the one with the triangular label, that looked very much like yours, Anne. That's also a Mirecourt trade name. It had very nice wood though, and was cleanly made. Same color. It looked to me like a good violin, but since it had a post crack in the back, I did not try to restore it, so I never heard the sound of it.

Posted

I read your comment on Anne's violin. You mentioned that one of your

violins was restored because of the post crack on the back.

I also have a very nice violin with post crack on the back and would

like to know your concerns about yours. My luthier recommended to have a

patch.

Thanks,

miles

Posted

Miles, I said that I did not restore the violn because of the post crack in the back. It also had been subjected to some very poor repairs. But I could tell that it was a decent instrument, or had been.

I just didn't want to spend a lot of time on it, since I couldn't make the post crack go away.

Yes, a patch is the only reasonable repair, and the violin can work well afterwards. But the value of the instrument will be reduced, even with the best repair.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...