geigen Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 Hi! ...I wonder if anyone is familiar with that label / french maker, I cannot decipher the label since someone has scraped parts off. The label reads "Lutherie Artistique" and then "G. xxxRNIER" or so. It's a cute french violin with high arching, around 1900. Thanks, Anne
fiddlecollector Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 that will be Gustave Fournier, which im sure is a trade name used by one of the French workshops.They often sound quite good though.
fiddlecollector Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 They seem t have been imported into the U.K quite alot around 1900-1920, alot appear in Scotland possibly supplied by some of the bigger trade dealers. Heres a pic of one. (i know a professional violinist who used one for years as a second violin ,he was handed it down by his father.)
fiddlecollector Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 Yes they all tend to look very similar,they are better trade violins and ive just remmembered who made them, the Laberte-Magnie (also named later in the 1920`s Fourier or Fournier/Magnie shop) in Mirecourt. Laberte also owned the trade names of Nicolas ,derazey,and others.The firm was run by relatives of Marc Laberte. Mangenot also produced some instruments with a `J.Fournier ` label.I guess that Fournier was probably an early 19th century maker, whos name was bought by these later workshops as a trademark name.
geigen Posted August 7, 2005 Author Report Posted August 7, 2005 hm, I don't think they have so much in common... these two violins look rather different in my eyes. Anyway, thanks! There is still a lot of work to do on that one. Neck is lose, some open seams, saddle, bridge, soundpost and that. Anne
fiddlecollector Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 It has some differences ,mainly the colour,the one i posted is the more usual colour of fournier violins ,ive seen around 20 and had 3-4 in the past. Yours is possibly made by one of the associated workshops ,Laberte-Humbert violins are often that colour(mirecourt orange) and strangely high arched, very bloated looking when viewed from the side.
T_Rocca Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 your violin reminds me of the Lowendal violins. the label is too new looking and was damaged on purpose
jackc Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 I had a Breton violin, the one with the triangular label, that looked very much like yours, Anne. That's also a Mirecourt trade name. It had very nice wood though, and was cleanly made. Same color. It looked to me like a good violin, but since it had a post crack in the back, I did not try to restore it, so I never heard the sound of it.
geigen Posted August 8, 2005 Author Report Posted August 8, 2005 Yes, I agree that it is a trademark violin. The label is very likely original. Thanks for your answers! Anne
miles Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 I read your comment on Anne's violin. You mentioned that one of your violins was restored because of the post crack on the back. I also have a very nice violin with post crack on the back and would like to know your concerns about yours. My luthier recommended to have a patch. Thanks, miles
jackc Posted August 9, 2005 Report Posted August 9, 2005 Miles, I said that I did not restore the violn because of the post crack in the back. It also had been subjected to some very poor repairs. But I could tell that it was a decent instrument, or had been. I just didn't want to spend a lot of time on it, since I couldn't make the post crack go away. Yes, a patch is the only reasonable repair, and the violin can work well afterwards. But the value of the instrument will be reduced, even with the best repair.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now