Fellow Posted September 6, 2004 Report Posted September 6, 2004 Hi All, I have a gut feeling that most violins, say 85% of them, have not really been played , but stored in closets or attics, violin shop glass cases, vaults etc. most the time. Being played mean that it was taken out at least 15 min played by someone two times in a week, that sort of frequency which is arbitrarily defined,just for our discussion purpose. Do you think so? ( There many more violins than players in existence so to speak ,true ?)
Noxx Posted September 6, 2004 Report Posted September 6, 2004 That raises a question I have too... ...if Paganini left the Cannon in his will on the condition that no one ever plays it again...but now they let the winner of th Paganini competition play it...isn't that some sort of violation of his will? Or are wills dated? And let's just say that if someone is playing it once a year...doesn't it need to be played consistantly in order for it to be sounding it's best for the competition winner? Then I'd assume someone is playing it regularily (a scheduale like Yuen suggested)? But if someone does have to play it regularly...then that REALLY violates Paganini's last request...right?
jmasters Posted September 7, 2004 Report Posted September 7, 2004 Most old German violins I have seen seem to be in this class. The ones that show a lot of use sound better to me. I do not know if this is because playing helped them, or if they were played because they were better. (survival of the fittest ?) Have you others experienced this ?
xania Posted September 7, 2004 Report Posted September 7, 2004 God, I would have thought that "being played" meant two or three hours, daily, for at least 6 months. I'm not sure that 15 minutes several times a week would make any differece at all!
Steve R. Posted September 7, 2004 Report Posted September 7, 2004 On my two, the better violin has been worn to bare wood in patches and the other still has almost fully intact varnish - both are about 200 yrs old. Both sat unplayed from 1930 till 1973, the lesser one was played for 6 years while the better was "too good for learning on" then they were basically set aside and sat until last year.
MANFIO Posted September 8, 2004 Report Posted September 8, 2004 I make my violins to be played. I like to see them in the hands of good musicians, being their first instrument.
Fellow Posted September 9, 2004 Author Report Posted September 9, 2004 Exactly, Manfio A maker should be proud of his/her violin being played regularly not for what it is selling for. "Playing" is a true appreciattion. What do you think?
MANFIO Posted September 9, 2004 Report Posted September 9, 2004 Yes, I remember of an story about traditional tool makers in Japan. They would feel disonored if the tools they had made were not in use by their owners because they were produced to be used.
Fellow Posted September 9, 2004 Author Report Posted September 9, 2004 I think a good violin should be played on, not to be sat aside (sit on the side line as a good football player). The bottom line is to bring the music out open. A good violin will do a better job. Do you think this way?
Steve R. Posted September 9, 2004 Report Posted September 9, 2004 I most definitely agree that a good instrument deserves to be played and the violin I mentioned above is now my primary instrument, being played daily. My #2 violin is now just sitting in a case mostly because I am playing the better instrument. At the time it was "too good" I was 12 and just learning. By many standards, the "lesser" 150 yr old (at the time) Bohemian violin was also "too good" for a beginner. On topic; My primary point above, was that due to the path of ownership, the violins sat unplayed for many decades, despite their worth. Sort of the reverse of the Strads and Del Gesus which are being preserved by collectors and museums because of their worth. Go figure.
flamenco Posted September 10, 2004 Report Posted September 10, 2004 Quote: Yes, I remember of an story about traditional tool makers in Japan. They would feel disonored if the tools they had made were not in use by their owners because they were produced to be used. That's how I feel about most things. I use chisels and gouges that my great grandfather used. These things were made to be used and used up. The great master violins are so rare and important as records that using them up is inappropriate. But ordinary things like I make should be used up! I expect that will take a long time. On the old violins not being played, I've had a number of nice old violins in good shape that sounded terrible. These always had some construction problems, typically graduations suitable for a lifetime warranty and some type of girder for a bass bar. Suitable relief from these complaints generally bought them to life! Steve
Guest Posted September 11, 2004 Report Posted September 11, 2004 <I use chisels and gouges that my great grandfather used.> Glad to hear this Flamenco. I am also using my grandfather's tools. They're ancient but they work well and I enjoy using them.
sherri Posted September 12, 2004 Report Posted September 12, 2004 would you happen to know where i can get some info on a 1743 johann adam schonfelder, made in germany
MANFIO Posted September 12, 2004 Report Posted September 12, 2004 Why don't start a new thread on this subject, with some photos, if possible?
JenS Posted January 12, 2005 Report Posted January 12, 2005 Sherri, I have a violin with the same makers label (johann Adam Schonfelder 1743) and I was wondering if you had any information regarding the maker that you may be able to pass on to me. thanks
SwtFreesia Posted March 9, 2005 Report Posted March 9, 2005 I am also looking for information about a 1743 Johann Adam Schonfelder... I haven't found anything about it online other than people asking about them- any help out there please email me at SwtFreesia1@aol.com
maestramusica Posted March 9, 2005 Report Posted March 9, 2005 So, maybe instead of shooting the breeze online with all of you, I ought to be practicing instead? (GASP!) Well, It would probably do a lot more to further my musicianship than all the time I've spent here in the last couple of weeks, even as much as I have enjoyed it. But I think I can find a balance!
Acyla Posted March 9, 2005 Report Posted March 9, 2005 maestramusica if you buy a lot of violins you should definately be playing more otherwise you're making the luthiers (such as MANFIO) around here feel bad. But I think that the more expensive and nicer an instrument is the more I feel the urge to play it. Sometimes if it's too good I get the "I am not worthy" bug and others I feel "this violin deserves a better player.. better shape up". It really depends on how much the difference to me is. I've actually wanted to learn more about fixing up violins so I've bought quite a few expensive books. Some have worked and others haven't (some have assumed knowledge in them which can be frustrating). But I'm having a blast with them. Acyla
regent Posted March 10, 2005 Report Posted March 10, 2005 Hi, SCHONFELDER--A large family of violin makers in Markneukirchen, Germany. It's most important members are Johann Adam, (1710-1763) and Johann Christian (1775-1821). Their instruments are well made, with good selections of wood, following the Tyrolean school. The varnish is usually yellow-brown or red-brown. 1999 prices: $2,000.00 - $2,500.00, depending on condition, etc.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now