Insane_Violinist Posted August 16, 2003 Report Share Posted August 16, 2003 Random question: Which violinist is more important in an orchestra: the principle of 2nds or co-concertmaster? Who is usually the better musician? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D_A Posted August 16, 2003 Report Share Posted August 16, 2003 I think it depends on the individuals involved. Sometimes the concertmaster is hired primarily for chops and not for musicality (i.e. s/he may be a better violinist, but not a better musician). I've seen instances when the principal 2nd and the associate concertmaster were better musicians than the concertmaster, and instances where the principal 2nd and the associate concertmaster were both good musicians, but one was a better technician. It is sometimes unfortunate when a concertmaster can play well, but doesn't have any idea how to set bowings that work for the section. That can really hamper an orchestra. It is especially frustrating in that situation, when you have an associate concertmaster and principal second who would be far more capable at setting good bowings, but they don't have a say in it! If you don't have a good player as principal second and the section suffers because of a lack of leadership, that can be more debilitating than if you don't have a good associate concertmaster (except in those rare instances when the CM is ill and the AC is playing concertmaster). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmysmith Posted August 16, 2003 Report Share Posted August 16, 2003 Concertmaster is the most important. 98% of the time he is responsible for bowings. He always has to lead the entire string section and he's responsible for communicating with the other string principals for musical whatevers. As far as better musicians, that depends on the orchestra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl-Victor Posted August 17, 2003 Report Share Posted August 17, 2003 This may be a bit toungue-in-cheek, but isn't the most important violinist the last stand second violin? After all, isn't an orchestra only as good as its least accomplished member? Obviously, the best orchestras don't hire anyone without great credentials, but I am thinking more about community and university orchestras, which generally have half a dozen good players, and a lot of barely adequate ones filling up the back spaces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropicalfruitmom Posted August 18, 2003 Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 Carl-Victor, I agree with you. I recently played a concert with a community group that contained many of the young students of the conductor. I ended up helping some of the kids with tuning and bowings - and I was playing principal bassoon on that concert! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleDave Posted August 18, 2003 Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 I agree with Carl-Victor's reasoning. Beyond that, the most important musician in an orchestra is the concertmaster -- just ask him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insane_Violinist Posted August 18, 2003 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2003 Hmm... well, I was recently 2nd violin last stand for a really good orchestra. I didn't feel too important... Ah well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.