Not quite. I couldn't get a picture because of the angle. The block comes in and tapers but is wider at the bottom than here. It doesn't have the supporting blocks to either side either.
I would hazard a guess that its origin is similar to mine, perhaps a bit older. I'm interested in the back of the scroll with the punch mark design. I wonder if that could help in determining the origin of the instrument? Or, was it probably a less expensive instrument and didn't have the carving go all the way to the back, and someone over here added that for effect? Interesting.
My cello has a wonderfully rich, sweet sound, and despite its detractors who have not heard it played, is a gem that bears the marks of successive owners, as this one does also. My cello is not a museum piece. It is worn but completely playable and is a treasure. I'm sure this one is also. To my mind the history of an instrument and the wear that it shows are testaments to the love bestowed upon it. Instruments that are 200+ years old are not going to be pristine. For them to be pristine would also mean that they were not loved. I will take a well loved and well used instrument over a pristine one every day and twice on Sunday. I hope the customer enjoys this gem! I hope that you will rebush the peg holes so you can keep the pegs.