Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

dpappas

Members
  • Posts

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dpappas

  1. On 6/12/2024 at 3:08 AM, Anson said:

    Can you please explain a bit more about why you prefer dynamos over rondo gold? I am currently using Rondos and I love their sweet and rich sound especially on the g string and overall projection, but I think I would prefer a slightly warmer and fuller sounding version of it so maybe rondo gold is the answer to that. But in the mean time I’ve heard so many great things about Dynamo. So I am really considering purchasing one of these two strings and I am interested to hear your opinion since you seem to have tried both.

    Sorry for the delay!  Rondos, PIs, and Rondo Golds are to me very "pure" sounding strings.  The Dynamos are very textured, you get a lot of grit to the sound, which I like.  For the Rondo Gold, and Rondo, I hear this midrange "honk" that I find unpleasant under the ear.  The Rondo Gold are definitely better in that regard than regular Rondo.  For pure, powerful strings you can't be PI.  For textured, powerful strings, there's a reason Dynamo strings are getting so much attention these days.

  2. I did not like the Rondo Golds.  But I also don't like Rondos.  The Rondo Golds are a high-quality product, no doubts there, but I just didn't like the core of the sound--it was sterile to me.  

    I prefer dynamos but they are completely different animal altogether.  I suspect people will like the Rondo Golds overall, they just didn't do the trick for me.

  3. 1 hour ago, germain said:

    It was a normal practice by luthiers of 19th century to replace tops instead of trying to fix them. I am assuming that is why the dendro doesn't match? The question is if the top is replaced and the scroll is not original are the back and ribs GDG?

    At what point is a GdG no longer so?  How much must remain intact/original before an instrument is no longer considered by the maker?  I know that's subjective, so I'm asking rhetorically.  For me, the box is the magic and the scroll and f-holes are the art.  I would want top, ribs, back, and scroll to be original.

     

     

  4. They are barely lower tension, I think 23.1 vs 23.4 kg.  My PIs were definitely old, but the dynamos really do project, I've been in orchestra rehearsals and others have confirmed it.  The whole point of the dynamos, if you believe Thomastik, is that they object while having more colors.  So far, I think they've pulled it off.

    Will I stay with them?  I'm not sure.  When they die off I'm putting PIs back on to see if it was a honeymoon phase kind of thing.  Also, I'm about a month in, who knows how they'll sound in 3-5 months.  My PIs last a long time before they give out.

  5. I have been a PI guy since I first tried them. I like pi power and tension and always considered them neutral and long lasting.  I turned a few other people on to them as well. 
     

    For the last month I’ve been playing dynamo strings.  They are powerful, slightly lower tension, but more “colorful”.  I mean they are less neutral and more projecting.   I like the range of colors and sounds I get.  I still like the PI, these are both excellent sets.  
     

    I’d say they are like PI but more broad.  

  6. Thanks, all.   I’m happy to report that I’m out of my sling and in physical therapy.  I have limited range of motion and even less strength.  I can now hold a violin, at least.  
     

    playing is exhausting and I sound terrible, very poor bow control.   But I, and my instrument, survived.  

  7. I sustained an major injury that will prevent me from picking up a violin, let alone play it, for 2-3 months.  I intended to leave it in its case tuned properly and check on it weekly.  Will that be sufficient?

    the instrument will be kept in the same climate controlled room as before.  It will just sit idle.  

  8. 9 hours ago, Advocatus Diaboli said:

    If your ears and the recording think it sounds better, then the additional output wasn’t in the right places.  Trust your ears first, record the measurements, and then decide what the measurements mean based on what you hear, not the other way around. 

    I agree with you 100%, it was amusing and education to see the "boost" wasn't anywhere important to my ears and brain.

  9. A few days ago I decided to acquire bridge tapping and bowing spectra to “see” if my new side mounted chinrest “sounded” better than my less comfortable center mounted one.  
     

    I was dejected when the spectra showed more output in all the right places for the center mounted one, which was counter to my ears and recordings at a distance.  How could my ears have lied to me?  
     

    So I redid the experiment the next day and got the opposite spectral result.  Same player, same everything.  
     

    I think spectra have some uses but also serious limitations and resolved that I should spend more time playing my instrument and less time looking at data.  

  10. I'm not sure if this is allowed on the forum, but I'm certainly not selling these so it might be okay.  I saw Pirastro has a new model of their Korfkerrest line, the Luna.  I love my Model 2, and can't imagine playing without it, so a collapsable one, that's slightly less expensive, is cool to see.  Thoughts?

     

    https://www.pirastro-shoulderrests.com/en/korfker-rest-luna-features/

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...