• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About notsodeepblue

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks very much - that's extremely helpful. It was mainly the small, equilateral corner-blocks that made me think this might not be the case, but that probably only goes to show how dangerous a little knowledge can be... thanks again,
  2. ...I know exactly what you mean! But in-the-hand, it feels like there has been an awful lot of unplanned movement over the years, so I'm not feeling totally confident about how mine will fare just yet...
  3. Hello all, I wondered if there was enough left in the wreckage pictured below, for anyone to help me identify how this might have been made? To my eye, it's key identification features - listed below - seem to be a little contradictory: - scroll carved to approx 8-o-clock, maybe a little later. - no delta on back of scroll. - small, equilateral corner blocks with no evidence of linings being let-in, but very difficult to tell what's original ...if anything. - one-piece bottom rib. - rather wonky outline / very off-vertical rib joints. - ribs join approx. in the middle, but difficult to tell. - no evidence of ribs the being installed in a channel on the back. - evidence of one pin the lower back (difficult to see through the grime anywhere else). I had imagined that this taken all together (by a process of elimination, more than anything else) might point towards a construction method that did not rely on a form of any kind - does this seem plausible, or am I miss-reading the features in some way? thanks in advance,
  4. ...probably depends on whether it's applied to the violin, or violinist.
  5. Fantastic pictures - thanks for posting. ...I'm now curious about the dorsal pins, though; from the sounds of it, there may be no widely accepted theory as to their original function. Was this part of the method adopted by the generations of makers apprenticed to those who originally used them, or did it die out / get lost along the way?
  6. That's extremely interesting - thanks very much. And can I just say, it never ceases to amaze me how you are able to read and understand a bow from so little information ...deeply impressive.
  7. I wondered if anyone might be able to tell me when open-trench frogs stopped finding their way onto bottom of the heap, mass-produced bows? I ask as I assume the bow pictured below fits this description, and it looks to be well matched to the fibre-board case and (simply) inlayed tailpiece it came with, which I had assumed were from the first couple of decades of the 20th century. I had thought this would be later than the typical date range for such open-trench frogs, but perhaps this is incorrect? thanks in advance,
  8. Have you seen this thread, already? If not, it has some interesting discussion that might be interesting to you even if it doesn't get you too much closer to a definitive answer...
  9. If out-and-out strength of this particular joint is critical (my take from a number of responses in this and similar threads, not something anyone has explicitly written, as far as i have seen), is there a reason why the through-neck - or some flavour of the same - is not favoured, for new-builds if not sensitive restorations? Is it the added mass of a maple upper-block that rules this out, or are there other considerations as well?
  10. Weren't some of Dodd's bows suspected to be made from wood from barrels (which I am assuming were a precursor - of sorts - to pallets)? I wonder if there were any equally-colourful violin makers mooching around the docks at the same sort of time, amongst similarly rich pickings?
  11. Not wishing to judge, but it seems like an odd thing to want to do to any bow. Sort of makes me wonder if they have been tempted to brand the sticks "pernambuco" too...
  12. For completeness, this group of marks is - I believe - called the "Full Traditional (UK) Hallmark", in which each individual mark contributes to the overall meaning. The last two, read from left to right, should be assay office and date letter. It is described properly here, in full, if you are interested:
  13. A few weeks ago, it seems as though the software on which Maestronet runs was updated to include a new feature - "post before registering". The docs here place this change at the end of Feb. 2019, which sounds about right based on my experience. Basically this new "feature" (...which is definitely not a "bug", by the way) means that anyone (including bots) can create a new topic the title for which will appear on the Maestronet home page, but the content of which will not be visible to anyone other than the original poster until it is either approved by a moderator (or banished forever). It sounds as though you and others are seeing the titles of these pending posts on the home page, while others may not be noticing (even though they are almost certainly there for everyone, if you care to go looking). I don't know how popular this particular software is, but I would imagine the phantom thread problem is likely to get worse as more automatic scripts get tweaked to exploit the bug feature, before anything changes and it improves.
  14. That's extremely helpful - thanks very much indeed.