J-G

Members
  • Content Count

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by J-G

  1. Looking at the score on imslp I can't see any reason why you'd need an arrangement. Looks like the oboe part should be quite playable on flute as is. (But you'd be playing in the original key of F major; the arrangements are both in G.)
  2. From the same maker: https://www.gilai.com/product_1179/Brass-Instruments-From-An-Original-Drawing-Set-By-Buterfield--Paris.
  3. J-G

    Choosing a Baroque bow?

    The OP's senior recital will have occurred nearly five years ago. It's good though to hear about what's available now for players wanting to experiment. I haven't gone in that direction myself, but if I were contemplating it I would start by absorbing the information presented here: http://www.historicalbows.com/
  4. J-G

    MALINE - Violin

    Here's the typical guitar bridge of the period. The pins press the string knots through the top.
  5. J-G

    MALINE - Violin

    A beautiful thing! Presumably the builder also made guitars: pin bridge, ivory edge-binding (ruined by a chin rest?). Any guitar-style bracing inside? The black sheep of the Maline family? (Like the guitar-building Panormo in London.)
  6. It seems off the string can mean two things: sautillé is sometimes described as a bouncing stick with the hair never leaving the string. That is, a faster alternative to spiccato. I think that's what you mean, Stephen? In post 7, exx. B and C, we get two forms of the "vertical dash". Does any composer or editor really distinguish between those two symbols? I think of them as meaning off the string. Fischer, in his ed. of Sevcik's Op. 3 Variations (sort of a bible for this stuff), defines the vertical dash as "jeté, spiccato or saltando". He defines the dot as "staccato or martellato'. A useful symbol not mentioned here so far is the bracket used by Sevcik to indicate at what point exactly in a passage the bow is to be lifted, or first lifted.
  7. Catharina in Latin. Connected with catharsis and the medieval Cathars. (But from a Greek root written with K-.)
  8. Well, for one thing it looks like those two fiddles would have pretty different vibrating string lengths... but do they in fact?
  9. J-G

    Lowendall query

    Thanks for the info, BF. I realise Lowendall was a big exporter, but would have thought only export instruments got the export (English) label. The bio quotes a Latin label presumably used for European sales.
  10. J-G

    Lowendall query

    Seems a little odd that a violin sold in Berlin in 1929 had a label in English. But it looks like a nice basic fiddle, probably good for many more miles. If there's enough hair left on the bow to play a bit, you should be able to decide whether it's worth rehairing. If not, there's lots of very cheap bows out there nowadays.
  11. In Sevcik's School of Bowing Technique I see printed at no. 5, exx. 191-5 the subtitle "Viotti's style of bowing". The exercises involve whole-bow strokes, starting on a weak beat, in which a short note is followed by a rest, then a long note on the same stroke, the long note showing an accent. So the rhythm is short/weak to long/strong on one bow. I don't know who first used that term, or what source it may have in Viotti's own playing. The Kreutzer example above likewise uses a slurred staccato to play weak to strong.
  12. Thanks for that, Don. So you need both figures (the Lucchi reading and the density) to predict elasticity?
  13. Andreas Grütter has some interesting comments on wood selection and the role of the Lucchi meter on this page of his site: http://www.andreasgrutter.nl/bow-couch/wood.html It appears the Lucchi reading relates more to elasticity than to density. (So yes, good to have both figures.)
  14. J-G

    MireCourt Violins

    A quick look at the company's 1905 catalogue (below) shows they were offering full-size finished violins in the price range 12 francs to 400 francs. So I'd imagine current prices too cover quite a range. Are you thinking of a particular model? http://www.luthiers-mirecourt.com/laberte_humbert_1905_2.htm#partie%202
  15. I suspect the bow requirements of amateur players (like myself) are not the same as those of the pros. I use a pretty soft bow that I find easy to control, but which probably isn't capable of the speed and bounce needed by soloists and pro orchestra players. I suppose a "good bow" is something a player has to grow into.
  16. I guess there must be some clarinet players that see one clarinet as a work of art, another as factory junk, but most probably get the best instrument they can afford for the job they need it for. And I imagine that is true also for most professional violinists. Artists or not, the workers in the video look like skilled professionals to me. The building of a violin by one person working alone and carrying out all the steps is far from being the only model historically. But the real factory violins, designed from the ground up for mass-production machinery with a minimum of handwork, were the Jackson-Guldans, produced in the USA between about 1920 and 1950. As Don Stackhouse wrote on another forum: "If Henry Ford had redesigned the violin to suit mechanized mass-production, the result would have been a Jackson-Guldan." His post continues with a detailed description of the unusual design features these instruments incorporated in order to eliminate hand work. In general, Mr. Stackhouse concludes the design served its purpose well. For those interested, his post appears about halfway down this thread: http://www.fiddlehangout.com/archive/425 (And yes, I play one, but only sometimes.)
  17. J-G

    Unusual violin bow

    Interesting to see one of these still in use. I've been reading through some of the old catalogues on Roland Terrier's site, and find that bows came in a bewildering range of grades a hundred years ago. This one must be near the bottom level-- "sans recouvrement" (no ferrule or MOP slide), plus no heel plate, no underslide, and a round bone button. And no doubt one of the cheaper woods of the many then in use. Here's the range of bows available from Thibouville around 1912: http://www.luthiers-mirecourt.com/thibouville1912_1.htm#Archets
  18. From 52 to the first two beats of 54 each two-beat figure arpeggiates a triad in the key of E: G#m, F#m, E, D#dim, C#m. Finger them all starting on 1. For intonation I would practise each chord as a pair of double-stops, fingering 1/3 (E and A strings) then 3/4 (A and E) for each chord. In the second half of 54 the chord shape changes. Fingering there will use 1, 2 and 4. Then in the first half of 55 use 1, 2, and 3. These last two chords can likewise be practised as pairs of double-stops. Hope this helps.
  19. "Shipping to Canada may not be available. Check with seller..." I'd guess it's an automatic warning Canadian viewers get.
  20. J-G

    Accidentals

    Got it, stillnew, so the Lento introduces the Andante, which leads into the scherzando, whose end we don't have. Makes sense.
  21. J-G

    Accidentals

    That's what a slow introduction often does. Is the next item by any chance in a quick tempo in D major?
  22. J-G

    Accidentals

    It's B# leading to C#. That's normal enough. But here an out-moded convention requires that the Bb (of the signature) be naturaled before it can be sharped. Not a reminder.
  23. Two identical members, but not really chinrests: Material seems to be painted wood, with felt glued under each piece. No markings anywhere. Simple enough to be home made, and maybe it was.