• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About ctanzio

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA

Recent Profile Visitors

3696 profile views
  1. Put aside playing technique for a moment and concentrate on the physical violin. Bridge: there is no scientific reason why a modern bridge cannot or does not emulate the playing characteristics of the so-called "baroque" bridge. A crappy bridge is crappy regardless of the style, and a good bridge is good regardless of the era it purports to represent. Getting an experienced luthier to carve a "baroque" bridge will make your violin look baroque if you want. Strings: There is a distinct difference in sound and playing characteristics between gut and most modern synthetics. But there are modern strings that emulate the timbre of gut. Again, picking gut strings over gut-like modern strings seems more of a choice for appearance than sound. Neck Geometry: You can find scholarly studies on this. To the extent that baroque necks were set to give a lower projection to the bridge (a lower bridge), that could have a noticeable affect on the sound. I believe it is mostly a power (projection) issue. Violin Body: Different violins sound different, regardless of age. Other than the bassbar, is there really such a thing as a "baroque" violin body? Bow: There is a decided difference between playing characteristics of a baroque style and modern (tourte) style bow. You can partially emulate the baroque style by gripping a modern bow closer to its balance point. TLDR: Use gut or gut-emulating strings and a baroque bow, or modern bow with baroque grip. Everything else is playing technique.
  2. Don't know. Never been sober enough enough to varnish after mixing one of these drinks.
  3. I use the denatured version to start my fire pit ever since that unfortunate incident with the gasoline. Still get that lovely "wooooosh" when the match is dropped into the pit, but none of that nasty "baaaaam" that blew off my eyebrows. I save a bit of the Everclear for sipping by the fire. A little simple syrup, a little kahlua, and a dash of triple-sec provides an adequate delivery system.
  4. Look into the upper eye of bass side f-hole. The bass bar should pass near the edge of the hole that is closer to the center of the violin. If it is passing under the hole itself or closer to the purfling edge, it is a non-standard bass bar location. A highly arched violin with an aggressive arch transition closer to the edge can have the effect of making the f-hole appear wider as you look sideways at the violin. This would enable you to see more of a bass bar that is in a typical location.
  5. In Pennsylvania, it is illegal to make potable (drinkable) alcohol by distilling unless you have a license, even for personal use. Potable alcohol by fermentation is legal without a license, but that limits alcohol content to 18% at best. A liter of 190 proof ethyl alcohol makes a lot of spirit varnish. The price of it does not seem to be an issue to me, unless you are running a production line for double basses. ;-}
  6. There are currently scanning programs that make decent work of converting sheet music to one of several "standard" digital formats. They get it mostly correct unless it is something like a score for a full orchestra. More notation programs, like MUSESCORE, are offering built-in conversion/scanning options, like PDF sheet music translation. It is trivial to open those formats in a notation program like MUSESCORE, and correct any errors. And it is equally trivial to have the notation program convert it to tablature. I apologize if I sound annoyed, but the OP asked a very specific question, and people chime in with answers that fail to address it as if the OP is some sort of musical misfit for even posing the question. It comes across as a bit snobbish and uninviting to new members. I have translated ancient lute tablature into staff and my first impression was how can anyone learn to proficiently read that old format. Yet people played lutes from that tablature for centuries, so it must be a skill that a great many people did not see as impossible to master. To this day I encounter guitarists who are clueless when it comes to staff notation, yet effortlessly play from guitar tabs. If you went on a guitar forum and asked about ways to translate tabs to staff, how would you feel if they told to to forget about it, learn to read tabs just because that was what they were most comfortable with? Even if there were easy-to-use programs that would do the translation for you? This concludes the grouchy-old-man screaming at the traffic outside his window portion of our program.
  7. The freeware program, MUSESCORE, will let you enter the sheet music in standard notation, and then with just a few mouse clicks convert it to tablature.
  8. ctanzio


    Nice! Thanks for the pictures.
  9. As a general observation, combined bending and shear forces in the top plate would be higher at the bridge and near the ribs, and lesser everywhere else. So the tendency is to make these areas thicker to lower the stresses and avoid possible fracture or creep failure. How thick is thick enough? That would take a sophisticated finite element stress analysis to determine. Luckily, we have a few hundred years of "common practice" to draw on so computer modelling seems less compelling. But if someone has a few grand in their bank account and are willing to part with it, I'd be happy to do the computer analysis. >grin< The roll of plate thickness in the back plate is more mysterious to me. I am inclined to think of the entire back as, ideally, a vibration node point. One wants the back plate thick enough to reflect most of the vibrational energy into the air cavity and top plate. The player might enjoy the sound coming out of the back plate, as well as the orchestra members sitting behind the performer, but it seems like an overall waste of energy for the audience.
  10. Also, what are the neck and stop lengths of the instrument and the height of the center of the bridge above the plate? I am struggling to find some correlation for violas to figure out if a bridge height is off or if the fingerboard has sunk.
  11. Love the varnish. I noticed the subtle flair to the finish of the peg ends. Attention to the little details contributes to the overall visual impression, IMO. Mind if I steal that finish to the pegs?
  12. I already gave the scientific definition of Stiffness/Flexibility. Resilience is the ability to return to the original shape after a load is removed that caused a shape change. This has nothing to do with how rapidly something returns to its original shape. Some materials exhibit behaviors at small loads that cause some of the deformation to become permanent, so it does not return to its original shape after unloading. Thin wood exhibits this behavior, especially at high humidity. Since we are talking about dynamic properties of the bow, resilience is not relevant. The bow material and geometry would have to be very resilient as a default property or else it would gradually become a straight stick after a period of time. Suppleness is the ability to deform over large distances without breaking or experiencing permanent deformation. Again, this is not relevant to dynamic properties of a bow since the default expectation is that the bow will not break or exhibit permanent deformation due to normal use. The speed at which a bow "snaps back" after being loaded is most directly related to stiffness. The stiffer the bow, the more rapidly it will snap back to a neutral shape after being unloaded. There is a damping effect on all this too, or else the bow and hairs might excessively vibrate. Again, be careful when evaluating a bow. The hair tension can dramatically alter the feel. When I hear people describe bows as strong or weak, I really have no idea what they are talking about.
  13. People are confusing terms in this thread that have a very specific scientific meaning. "Stiff" means a small change in shape for a given applied force. For a bow, this means that for a given pressure or force applied to the bow, it will bend only a little bit. "Flexible" is the inverse of "Stiff". A flexible bow will bend a lot for a given pressure or force applied to the bow. If by "Strong" you mean "Stiff", then a bow cannot be both "Strong" and "Flexible". You are either misusing the terms, or using the term "Strong" in a context other than "Stiff". Adding to the possible confusion is the response of the hairs. One can have a very stiff bow, but have hairs that are rather flexible, for example, lightly tensioning the hairs with the screw, having inferior hairs or using less than the standard number of hairs when the bow is rehaired. Playing with such a bow will give the impression of flexibility, but it is not because of the bow.
  14. Vacuum also lowers the boiling point of water, so it is possible to get wood down to almost 0% MC with a vacuum chamber at room temperature. One of the challenges with thermal aging many materials is getting a high enough temperature to get results in a reasonable amount of time, versus having the material decompose through high temperature processes that would not normally activate at room temperatures. For wood, once one approaches 140C, all sorts of nasty processes begin to kick in that would normally not activate at room temperature. And this is for wood being heated in a chamber filled with non-reactive gas, like nitrogen. This is referred to in the literature as pyrolysis testing. In the presence of oxygen, all bets are off that thermal aging at elevated temperatures will simulate natural aging at room temperature.