DBCooper

Members
  • Content Count

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About DBCooper

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday October 22

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    PA

Recent Profile Visitors

773 profile views
  1. A beautiful looking bow, Dwight. Congrats! I think these are fine innovations if it simplifies the maintenance and longevity. I am intrigued by the Nehr design and have considered commissioning one as well. Most of all, enjoy playing your new bow!
  2. Don, that is a great example using something other than violins. Even without the mics, it's clear that Pavarotti is the superior instrument with regard to projection and quality.
  3. I think David touches on a good point. Often, I think that this "phenomenon" of great violins sounding softer under the ear is just miscommunication and misunderstanding. What the player is hearing in these cases is less harshness and more quality, which they may equate to "softer" because they are used to a harsh under-ear sound that doesn't carry all that well. I've played many violins that sound brash and loud under ear, but the frequencies they produce do not come together properly to actually project well.
  4. Or, do they concertize on these instruments and leave their GdG/Strad in the case (and also in the program)?
  5. 1) Good rosin doesn't need to be scratched. Cheap rosin is so hard that it doesn't work, and that is where this myth began 2) The "+" sign pattern is not good. It causes fracture points for the rosin, and if the grooves get deep it can scratch and damage the stick. Move the cake in a random pattern so that the top remains level, and you can also use the entire cake this way.
  6. Fantastic idea! It might be nice to have periodic interviews with great contemporary violin and bow makers.
  7. There is no need to get violent, although if you get enough makers or players together, this is almost inevitable.
  8. I agree with that completely-- Dominants have a richness to the core of the sound that isn't as present in PIs. But what PIs do well is indeed impressive, and they still remind one more of Dominants than of the other Thomastik lines, like the Vision family. Evah Golds are truly amazing sounding strings -- for a short time. PIs on the other hand (and Dominants) hold their quality much steadier throughout their lifespan IME.
  9. Some notable soloists that used to use Dominant strings have switched to Peter Infeld over the last several years: James Ehnes (with aluminum D and Gold Label thick E) Pinchas Zukerman (sometimes uses Vision Solo as well) Glenn Dicterow (with aluminum D and tin E) Noah Bendix-Balgley (with Gold Label thick E) As well as some great quartet violinists: Emerson String Quartet Takacs String Quartet Aron String Quartet Classically, Thomastik-Infeld lists Hilary Hahn as a Dominant player, but word is that she changes to a new set 24 hours before every concert. There are well-known players like Itzhak Perlman supposedly using Dominant strings, but closer inspection of publicity and concert photos show that he often uses an Infeld Red D/A, sometimes a PI D, and sometimes what appears to be a full set of Peter Infeld. It seems to me that testing PI’s, they are much like a more refined Dominant string. They retain many of the qualities Dominant made popular, but they add some increased longevity, more focused sound, improved response, and possible more sound colors. They also seem to be a drop-in replacement adjustment-wise. What do those of you who have tried both Dominant and PI think? Are Peter Infeld the “new dominant” among classical players and soloists? ** I know there are many people using other strings by Pirastro and other makers, but this thought is limited to the scope of Dominant users switching to Peter Infeld.
  10. Wikipedia says this about that: The chemical composition of wood varies from species to species, but is approximately 50% carbon, 42% oxygen, 6% hydrogen, 1% nitrogen, and 1% other elements. I've been had!! And Wikipedia says this of cellulose: Cellulose contains 44.44% carbon , 6.17% hydrogen, and 49.39% oxygen. So, if wood is comprised mainly of cellulose fibers, and cellulose fibers are primarily carbon, wood is an arrangement of cellulose fibers comprised primarily of carbon. No?
  11. Artificial wood? Isn't wood made of carbon fibers?
  12. Another option is to learn how to tune the G-D-A with the peg, which is normal for synthetic strings.
  13. But I just said: Also, I don’t think the il Cannone sounds that great. :-D
  14. Probably not very. Also, I don’t think the il Cannone sounds that great :-O He had some great PR going though, to become such a legend.