Jump to content
Maestronet Forums

Marty Kasprzyk

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About Marty Kasprzyk

  • Birthday 06/02/1945

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Olcott, NY, USA
  • Interests
    Wine making, gardening, dog training,

Recent Profile Visitors

12365 profile views

Marty Kasprzyk's Achievements


Enthusiast (5/5)

  1. I've made two octave violas and I found they sounded very nice but they were difficult to bow. Various strings are made with different density core and winding materials so it's more appropriate to calculate their mass per unit length M to compare them rather than their diameter. For example a steel wound string will have a larger diameter than a silver or tungsten wound string even though they have the same pitch. The mass per unit length M can calculate with: M= T/(4L^2 f^2) where T is string tension, L is string length, and f is the tuning frequency. The cello string length is about twice as long a viola's so with the same same pitch frequency and string tension your octave string has to be about four times heavier. Many string manufactures list their string tensions f for their different strings at their playing length L so their string mass per unit length can be calculated. You can then calculate your viola's mass per unit length for each of the four strings and then search for four strings that have four times that mass per unit length. I suggest using tungsten wound steel core strings such as D'Addario Helicore strings because they will have a small diameter which will make your bowing easier.
  2. DB might recommend using a Sawzall to do the scroll shaping.
  3. Different people like different things so there's a lot of scatter in preferences which means there will be a lot of scatter in the violin's physical make-up (wood properties, dimensions etc.) of what's liked. The VSA competitions use 3 tone judges who are well regarded players. Very few times will a violin get all three judges to like a violin and these are the medal winners. Violins often are liked by only one or two players. I consider these violins to be successful because at least some good players liked them. There are relatively few violins without any judge liking them. I've never seen it tested but I would bet three different good players-just by chance- would give different judging results. This makes finding a "theoretical goodness value" difficult.
  4. Lutheries who don't like numbers should get rid of their rulers and calipers.
  5. Jim Woodhouse has a good discussion on plate runout in his web site "Euponics" chapter 10 Wood: Properties and Measurement. See his figures 8&9. https://euphonics.org/10-3-wood-properties-and-measurement/
  6. Don't our own eyes create a similar relative size distortion effect? If I hold up something real close to my eye everything in the background looks small. For example if I hold my finger tip (20mm wide) a few inches away from my eye this computer screen entry looks real small and my fingertip covers half (100mm) of this page. But if I move my finger tip to touch this screen it covers up only about 21mm.
  7. Thanks, it's nice to know I'm not alone. I got rid of the shoulder rests, rubber bands, corners, chinrest clamps, tailpiece, chords, and end pins to make the instrument easier and more comfortable to hold and nothing falls off during playing.
  8. Please elaborate on what you mean by "easy to play (especially as regards to shifts)".
  9. Thanks for sharing your experience. Did you sense any difference in the instrument's weights? Were they all using the same make strings?
  10. I was a participant in an experiment at an Oberlin Acoustics Workshop about 12-15 years ago where we made incremental length narrow saw cuts ( I did the saw cutting so people could blame me afterwards for the impending wastefulness) alternating in increments above the upper eye of an f hole and below the the lower eye of an f hole in a simulation of what happens when various length cracks appear in these locations. Mechanical engineers (not train engineers) know that sharp corners produce stress concentrations that can lead to crack initiations. That is why f holes have their rounded tops and bottoms --these large radius shapes try to avoid cracks from starting. Nevertheless cracks still tend to start there because of the large load applied by the strings on the island area between the f holes. Much to our surprise the simulated crack saw cuts from the f holes actually improved the sound of this violin (a violin donated for the experiment which I wrecked and made unsalable). These cut were extended in a few centimeters at a time until they no longer showed an improvement in group listening tests. This might mean that cracks are not what be what they are cracked up to be.
  11. The problem with cracks in a violin top plate is that their opposing surfaces rub against each other to produce a nonmusical noisy sound. If you use a saw to make the cracks wider so that their surfaces don't touch each other then the violin actually sounds better than if it didn't have the cracks. F holes are just really wide cracks.
  12. If you are serious about wanting to make great violins I suggest this inexpensive book to help you get started: Bonnie Trachtenberg The Fine Art of Delusional Thinking: Happiness Means Never Having to Have a Reality Check
  13. Stewart Pollens suggested that the earliest violins had three strings tuned EAD and that later ones had an added G string. He described how that the length of the E string was as long as possible with gut strings while maintaining a factor of safety on string tension having one half tone of pitch. When designing new instruments one has to first chose what pitch range is desired. The early violins were developed to produce higher pitched notes than previous instruments. The length of the highest pitch string was determined by the breaking strength of the gut string materials. That gives the maximum tension possible which results in the loudest output possible. I've used Helicore viola steel E strings on a large 17.5in 5 string viola with a string length of 378mm. Stradivari couldn't have done this in his day. Early big instruments of the violin family (cello and bass types) were developed to produce low pitch notes and they had a much different problem. Their gut strings had to be real long to produce the low frequency notes because the gut material has a low density (~1.3g/cc). The only way they could have a high mass per unit length was to make them real thick in diameter which in turn made them difficult to bow and finger. They had high bending stiffness (not ideal) due to their large diameter so their overtones were not in a perfect harmonic sequence so they didn't sound very pleasing. Metal wire overwraps were eventually added onto the gut strings to greatly increase their mass per unit length which enabled shorter string lengths to be used which in turn allowed the large cello and bass instruments to be made smaller while the playability and sound quality improved. Thus experiments were done to increase the string length of violins and the string lengths of large instruments were made smaller. All of the above is well documented history. What we don't know is Stradivari's motivation to develop his long pattern violins and why he reverted back to only shorter ones. I speculated that it was due to gut E string breakage problems as a possible explanation. I think it should be noticed that he made long pattern and shorter ones simultaneously for a while. He didn't go short, then just long, and then back to short. Some Thoughts on the Tuning of the Early Three-String Violin STEWART POLLENS The Galpin Society Journal Vol. 64 (March 2011), pp. 61-66 (6 pages) Published By: Galpin Society https://www.jstor.org/stable/23209390 woodrow's length.pdf
  14. My theory is that Strad's long pattern violins originally had longer necks and string lengths. Longer strings would have to have higher tension if they are tuned to the same pitch. This higher tension would have increased the loudness of Strad's long pattern violins which may have been advantageous at that time (still is). But the higher tension would have also further increased the likelihood of gut E string breakage and players may have complained so he eventually went back to his shorter body violin designs with their shorter and safer strings. Modern steel E strings have eliminated this breakage problem so much longer strings can now be used. But we're pretty much stuck with using traditional size violins and string lengths.
  • Create New...