Greg F.

Members
  • Content count

    231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Greg F.

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  1. Basic Acoustics Resource

    Are you sure about the density you measured?
  2. another bow

    I rehaired my bow and though it's rather light (about 54.5 grams) it seems to draw a good sound and works well with my newbie repertoire (mostly fiddle tunes). So I'm happy, even if I don't know who made it.
  3. Only the good survive

    Probably endless. Pointless is up for debate.
  4. Only the good survive

    Yes indeed. Of course, pointless and endless arguments are pretty much the whole and endless point of most internet discussions.
  5. Only the good survive

    People knowledgeable about Stradivarius' production (not me, I think the Hills studied it) have estimated that somewhere around 1100 instruments were made of which perhaps 60% have survived in one form or another. This is, to my mind, rather remarkable. My recollection is that knowledgeable estimates of Del Gesu survivals are even higher than that of Stradivarius. How many 300 (or more) year old fragile utilitarian objects have survived at similar (estimated) percentages. I doubt there are many.
  6. Only the good survive

    Regarding the survival of Strads, I'd say it's astounding that something over 50% are believed to still exist (as an aside, what % of Amati's violins are thought to have survived?). Consider that they are wood, fragile, made for a utilitarian purpose, etc. They were never made to be hung on a wall and just looked at. And then consider the upheavals in Europe over the past 300+ years.
  7. screws

    I've read that screws for the underslides of bows are more common on German ones, but wonder if anyone can help expand on this topic. For example, I assume that there is a date before which screws were not used by anyone. True? If so, when did the use of screws by some makers become common. Does it make a difference regarding makers or schools if the screws are brass, nickel or other? One screw or two? Does their location relative to the eyelet matter?
  8. another bow

    No word from Mr. Gruenke to my out-of-the-blue email. Not surprising as it is understandably best for him to ignore such inquiries. I have a question about screws for the underslide. Is there a date at which such screws came into general use? What are the various metals used for such: brass, nickel, silver, other? Is a particular metal more common to a particular school or country? Does the location of the screws relative to the eyelet mean anything? Just wondering.
  9. Bow Wood Identification

    Whatever was done it looks remarkably "sterile".
  10. Bow Wood Identification

    Yes, that's the one. It just looks to have less noticeable grain than the others.
  11. Bow Wood Identification

    fiddlecollector, Terrific group of pics and very very informative. Re the pernambuco bows, I'm having a hard time seeing the similarity of bow #18 (counting top to bottom then left to right) to the other pernambuco bows. Maybe something about the finish? Just wondering, Greg
  12. Another Bow for Discussion

    I'm no expert so take what I say with a giant grain of salt. The chamfering (and lack thereof) on the head looks somewhat crude and unfinished. Nothing jumps out (to my eyes) about the wood being special. Full nickel silver mounted frog, etc., suggests middle of the road student bow. Maybe one of our true experts will render an opinion soon.
  13. When have you 'arrived'?

    I have yet to leave the station, so arriving is out of the question.
  14. bow wood id

    Maybe this pic of the brand will help a tiny bit (or maybe not):
  15. bow wood id

    I came across an interesting (to me) catalog from 1892 that had both an "imitation" Bausch and "genuine" Bausch for sale. The former at $5 and the latter at $8.13 (neither being a small sum in 1892 as many workers made $2 or less per day). Since the real Bauschs were gone by this time (1874 if wikipedia is to be believed) then is it reasonable that the "genuine" Bausch was a product of the "real" firm that carried on using the name? I've also included another scan of the brand on my "Bausch" bow discussed above and wonder if the brand is consistent with an old bow (before WWI) (the brand is very faint, the "L" starts just to the left of the tongue, the pic is the best I can do with my scanner). (BTW, the adjuster on this bow is certainly a much newer replacement). Thanks in advance.