Jump to content
Maestronet Forums


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About DR. S

  • Birthday 01/10/1959

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    North Central Texas, USA
  • Interests
    Supporting the arts. When I have time I love to golf, walk/hike/camp, and travel.

Recent Profile Visitors

11770 profile views

DR. S's Achievements


Enthusiast (5/5)

  1. it is a copy made in Germany, probably late 18th to early-mid 20th century. Probably patterned after a Nicola Amati instrument (b 1594 - d 1684, who is usually considered the best of the Amatis. This German maker/shop probably made copies of several Amati Instruments, thus the hand written last 2 digits identifying the year of the Amati that was copied, they could print up one label and use it for several instruments, or they just did that to emulate old Cremona labels that often did this.
  2. I have a Jargar Forte on order, used to use them on my viola. Vibrating length is just under 37 cm. I'll see if I can find a Larsen, Shar did not have them, I keep some for my violin as spares simply because they break in almost immediately, but so expensive, and not really better than what I use normally in the long run. Also ordered a Vision Solo.
  3. I need to try to find an A string for my viola that has a little more oomph than my current dominant. I am fine with Dominant on my other strings, but it loses power up high and I know it is not my instrument. I know ultimately it comes down to what works, but there are a lot of new strings out there and I want to narrow down the search. So any suggestions of what to try? FYI - Evah Pirazzis are a hard no on my instrument - tinny and squeaky (but they are angelic on my violin, so go figure).
  4. Great Music is Great Music, Bach's greatness survives transposition or re-instrumentation or re-orchestration without losing a thing. Vibrato or no? Romantic interpretation or Stoic fundamentalism? Performers choice as to how to play it and the listeners choice as to what they want to hear. The music is not affected and the name of Bach is not sullied. Get over it people. Revel in his genius and artistry. Your opinion is just that. There is no right or wrong. Whatever Bach piece you are playing, make it your own.
  5. I need new instrument cases for my violin and viola and a double case to carry both. The cases I bought a few years back (American) just did not hold up. There are so many new cases on the market and the price range is crazy, I'd rather not pay $3000 but I want a sturdy case that will last. I have looked for ratings but they are all over the place with very little agreement on what is best. My instruments are valuable and need good protection, but I doubt I really have to buy a $3000 case to protect it adequately. I prefer oblong cases and don't care that much about weight. What are your experiences. Anyone know if there is any actual test data.
  6. For me it is his cellos that really set him apart. I have played several of his violas and violins and the contemporary instruments I own, by relatively unknown makers are considerably better (not just my opinion.) I also find his violas physically difficult to play, heavy with a thick neck. I know one professional who had to replace his Caron viola because of physical problems caused by the instrument. But still, his cellos are etherial.
  7. I know a cellist in the Houston Symphony that owns 2. Caron is a personal friend of his and both instruments were custom built for him. The last one is an exquisite work of art with a special Hawaiian hardwood diamond patterns inlaid in the back and used for the pegs, nut, end pin holder, and tailpiece, and the diamond pattern was also used in the carving of the scroll and shape of the pegs. David kept it for a year as an exposition instrument before sending it on to my friend. Wish I had taken photos. You will notice his cellos rarely rarely come up for sale.
  8. there are passages in Mahler's 1st, Mvnt 1, Beethoven's 5th and 6th, to just name a few, that bring waves of emotions that verge on tears, and these are emotions of pure joy. I did not mean to imply that sadness is the only reason people cry from music, just surprised at how dominant that reason seemed to be in the thread.
  9. What strikes me is that everyone here is talking about a piece making you cry because it is sad. I never actually cry due to a piece of music but do get a great well of emotion that I could see easily cause tears. But never sad. Mahler 1, Beethoven 7 (especially the Allegretto), 5th, 6th, 9th, to just name a few all do this for me. Popular tunes done well and in the right context, such as Hallelujah, and yes, Ashokan Farewell can do this as well. I had a student, a young lady in her early 30s, who was working on the Meditation from Thais and I played it for her in a lesson with commentary on what I was doing and why, to get her to feel the rubato and dynamic ebb and flow of the piece. When I finished, I was surprised to see that she had tears streaming down her face - I have seen that reaction from people in memorial services that I have played it for, but there was in the context of a sad event. But I have to say, if you didn't cry, at least just a little in the beginning of the movie "UP" with the music "Married Life" there is something wrong with you, in fact this is used by psychologists to determine empathy in patients, but course this is also music superimposed over a sad event or sad or moving story and in that context i understand the tears for sadness, but not for the music alone.
  10. Yes - spicatto, off the string.
  11. Jacobsaunders - Yes, that is the instrument.
  12. I did not talk to the person who did the dendrochronology, so I am not sure. I understood it to be the same tree, but could be mistaken. Not sure how much that matters, I guess same tree would have more weight (and be cooler!) than same forest, but the dating and locale would still be valid.
  13. Worthless for insurance purposes, but you need to understand the nature of this business, especially when dealing with potential values in 7 figures, and with all the history of fraud, even in recent years. Reputation is everything. 95% percent certainty is not enough, and a violin at this level will most certainly need an appraisal at the top level of the industry. No one below that is going to risk their reputation. Their appraisals are not anonymous to the owner or me, but out of respect for their wishes is being held in confidence. Also, to answer some of the speculation, since they were unwilling to issue a certificate or written report, fees were returned. These were honest men. We got the info that we need for now. We are quite certain about what this is. Until the owner decides to sell, he is perfectly happy as things are. But keep the snide remarks coming. I really don't blame you, this is a one in a million event and skepticism is warranted. I have been skeptical up to this point, but I am now convinced. And as I have pointed out, I have no skin in this game, doesn't change a thing about the quality of the instrument I am playing on. Actually, this pretty much means at some point the instrument will be 'moved on' and sold, and it is definitely many many times out of reach for me to purchase, so in the end this news is a loss for me. My personal instrument is actually a very good modern and it feel like a truck played next to this instrument.
  14. Dendro report is done and and a third expert has looked at the instrument. None will sign off on their opinion, or allow their names to be used, because of legal reasons, but all who have looked at it, independently, came up with the same conclusion. The wood is circa 1689, Believed to have come from the same tree as used for 3 known Strads and 2 Guarneris. While no one really believes it is a Stradavari (pattern is not right) or a Nicolo Amati (actually too powerful and made about 40-50 years too late), they do believe it is from a significant maker, and thus the resistance, in today's market and the importance of maintaining reputations, to documenting an attribute to it as to maker or value. All scoffed at the idea that it is French. It has had significant rework, restoration on it, possibly a non-original scroll, and it was speculated that is was a prototype or experimental model as it is 2-4 mm longer than the standard patterns of the day. I think basically the only path to get an actual certificate will be to take it to London for a top tier appraisal when the owner is ready to put it on the market. Meanwhile, I am enjoying the heck out of it. So nothing concrete, but a definite trend toward a specific answer.
  15. Hard to just say what is an Amati like - lots of Amatis in that line over a pretty long period. The earlier Amatis are sweet and rich, but not very powerful. Nicolo Amati on the other hand is often credited with the development of the patterns, techniques, and training that allowed Strad and Guarnieri Del Gesu, (and many others) to do what they did. And his instruments were more powerful. Strad and his workshop pretty much 'perfected' the instrument and very consistently produced great instruments. Guarnieri Del Gesu produced a few that are often considered among the greatest concert instruments ever produced (such as the Cannon that Paganini used), but they were not as consistently great as Strads and some are notoriously hard to play (i.e. the Cannon). Earlier Guarnieris were more like Amatis - rich, warm, dark, but not powerful. As far as the best moderns and old Italians compare, I think it is true that if you blindfolded someone and played for them, they may not be able to tell you which is which, however, if you handed them the instruments to play, still blindfolded, most of the time they would be able to tell which is which quite easily. It may simply be the effects of age, many of today's instruments, in a couple of hundred years, may develop just as good of a feel and nuance as the best old Italians (or French) violins have today.
  • Create New...